FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
As the wretched Attorney General Harvey Korman in Mel Brook's "Blazing Saddles" remarked:
"Where am I going to find such a man . . . and why am I asking you?"
Unfortunately, and disappointedly so the above Tennessee Code citation is limited to the subject of treating movable structures that are attached to land (including those units contained within a trailer or mobile home park) as real property for purposes of tax assessments.
What is needed is...
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
I assume the father's custody suit is pending in California. If so, then none of the courts in California would have jurisdiction to determine custody UNLESS the child resided in the state of California for a continuous period of 6 months immediately prior to the date...
Aside from the temporary protective order and current sibling hostilities - and speaking in general terms only - you're faced with four options concerning future arrangements between you and sister with respect to the home.
(1) As tenants in common you can continue to jointly occupy the home...
First hypothesis:
(a) Beneficiary #2 has no legal recourse against beneficiary #1. (No more than if beneficiary #1 had embezzled $100K from his employer.)
(b) Mom's estate has a cause of action in tort against beneficiary #1.
(c) However, estate claim cannot be pursued when beneficiary #2...
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 4.08.030
"Either spouse or either domestic partner may sue for community—Necessary parties.
Either spouse or either domestic partner may sue on behalf of the community: PROVIDED, That
(1) When the action is for personal injuries, the spouse or the domestic...
Did you take notice that the estate has undergone or is in the process of undergoing summary administration? Because what you propose is not feasible under the circumstances.
It mistakenly presumes that preliminary to the issuance of an order for summary administration and distribution of...
Just whom or what do you believe is liable to reimburse you for your mentioned expenditures?
The only visible candidates are the unidentified "other beneficiary" (obviously your sibling) and/or the sibling's distribution of part of the estate pursuant to the order of summary administration...
Interesting reads, perhaps, but your listed authorities bear no significance to the issue at hand.
The issue being that in the instance of the buyer's default in payment for manufactured goods the manufacturer's rights to resell said goods pursuant to the UCC in the attempt to recoup some of...
I read with interest the entire bit of your NAM propaganda! Which notably comes up short of significant case law or statutory authority!
Now I invite you to read this - containing significant case law authority.
"The central focus in any trademark infringement claim is the likelihood of a...
My thanks to both you and the authors for not redacting the following from your cited article:
In conclusion:
"There is nothing per se illegal about an unauthorized sale of genuine” goods."
With all due respect for your notable perspicacity, I fail to see any logic whatsoever for your steadfast resolve insisting that in consequence of the buyer's breach that it is more practical that the affected seller sue on the contract price rather than attempt to recover some of its loss by...
I disagree.
Filing a breach of contract suit makes no sense! Not when compared with the "resale" remedies as afforded by Section 2-703 of the Uniform Commercial Code - which incidentally has been adopted by all 50 states.
No sensible manufacturer would risk exchanging its property rights in...
Why would it be deemed a trademark infringement when the proceeds of a sale under (UCC 2-703 (d)) would be to the credit of the owner of the trademark?
Ignorance of unfamiliar subject matter is understandable. Refusal to acknowledged one's ignorance and yet persist in broadcasting it to the detriment of others it is arrogant stupidity!
Contrary to your unduly pomposity criminal arraignments NEVER PRECEDE THE FILLING OF FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES...
Contrary to what you may have read there is no NY codified time period during which the defendant must await before seeking dismissal of pending charges asserting the denial of the right to a speedy trial. (See: NY CPL Section 170.30 and 255.200)
Secondly, the 30-30 clock doesn't begin to tick...
I have to question that you are cognizant of the disadvantages were you to transfer legal ownership of your home to a third person or entity. Even if the trust were revocable, difficulties would be encountered should the need to reassert the rights and control attributed to full ownership...
Excuse me, but the above expression is an utter falsehood. Misleadingly false in that it would have the OP mistakenly believe that in California the singular act(s) of apply community assets (or those separately owned by the non-titled spouse) in the payment of a mortgage lien covering real...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.