FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
I can't speak with authority, but my limited observations are that people that are truly nuts don't know that they are nuts. Consequently, they lack motive to bandying about that they are nuts. Some important contrasting literary/cinematic examples follow.
Sane, but feigning insanity...
A word of caution here! The line or course of the existing fence may have greater legal significance than you are aware!
If in existence ten plus years (Mo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 516.010) it could in fact prevail over your so-called "survey print" as defining the legally recognized common boundary...
Are we talking sixteen plus years?!
If so, I seriously doubt that any effort on your part to enforce adherence now (irrespective of theory or venue) would survive the defense of laches. *
You best seek an opinion from local counsel. But I don't think you will be happy with the result...
(Like the politician is said to have said: "I don't care what they write about me as long as they spell my name correctly". So, I suppose some personal pleasure might be due here in the knowing that someone is paying attention to my feeble/testy contributions.)
---------------
But my goodness...
If you truly need to be told (doubtful) when your cause of action (if any) matured and if it remains viable for litigation then stop with the pretentiousness and pussy footing and simply explain the who, when, what and where of it. It ain't rocket science, pal!
Debating the connotations of words absent clarifying context seems pointless. There are serious legal implications to be considered here! None of which have been mentioned.
Whether it involves individuals, legal entities or a combination of the two it is never a good idea to enter into a...
Shucks! Standing or sitting law enforcement will never be the same.
By the way I recall having an uncle whose jobs was swabbing the jail house floors. Would that count as working in law enforcement? Or would the unfortunate fact that he was a temporary guest disqualify him?
The need to jog smuty's memory about his cock'n bull yarn (as if it were commonplace for an employee/contractor to pay his employer'/principal's business advertising costs) is convincing confirmation that it was just that!
Pardon me for calling attention to the inaccuracy of your response. It is not entirely in conformity with California law and hence misleading.
It is true that property sold via an action of partition can be ordered sold to the highest bidder at a public auction. However, in Californian (unlike...
What Court decided when . . . ?
Your 1st (court) appearance in what court and where?
What means "that" letter" and from what court?
Why would you be "processed by the police after the court hearing" when we are told (6/5/23) that the charges were dropped?
MY goodness how your lies continue...
It is indeed remarkable that you were able to go from receiving a warrant of arrest out of Lancaster, PA; the fulfillment or waiver of the protracted extradition processes; deal with the issuance and service of a NY Governor's warrant; select, consult and hire a Pennsylvania criminal defense...
Please don't use words distorting the clear, unequivocal intent of the statute. It's confusing and misleading.
The statute of frauds simply states that to be enforceable "a promise by one person to answer for the debt of another person must be in writing and signed by the person to be charged...
Well, rest assured that I'm not selling that line. I make not claim of perfection. Not as to any category.
Yes, I'm guilty of having made mistakes - life in general and including those made over the course of forty plus years as a private practitioner. Some best forgotten and some making me...
But suppose the OP cannot produce a writing signed by the contractor agreeing to be responsible for paying the magazine company? What then, Q?
Would the "Main Purpose Doctrine" as an exception to the surety proviso of the statute of frauds apply here? Is it recognized by the Texas courts...
May it be assumed that somewhere within the above lengthy response there's a concession that the "it never hurts" statement should not be taken as categorical?
And that when expressed as an unqualified proposition it has the likelihood of misleading the laity to thinking that such efforts are...
Begging your pardon, but that's a disturbing remark coming from an attorney!
How do you explain it in view of the universal exclusionary rule? (For instance, as it is codified in Rule 408 of the Texas Rules of Evidence?)
" Compromise Offers and Negotiations
(a) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of...
Whether you are "ok with it" or not and regardless of the status of the manager of your crews as either an independent contractor or employee that individual bears no legal responsibility whatsoever for any of said advertising charges placed on "one of your credit cards"!
Your abortive efforts...
Most enchanting! (Yet some less favorably moved might view it as self-absorbed pattering of no material consequence.)
"To love oneself is the beginning of a lifelong romance." (Oscar Wilde 1854-1900)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.