Number ONE, that is a complete fallacy. You assume that because it is possible for me to get a girl pregnant, that I will. All you are doing is poisoning the well. As well as personally attacking me, you are bringing up irrelevant information. I wanted to know how to pass on legal guardianship to a person who would be my caretaker.Both of yoru parents would have to consent. Hope they are cool with having a teen Dad for a son. I wouldn't be.
Secondly, both of my parents would NOT have to consent for me to move out. I am of legal age to do so, at least in my state. The only problem is convincing my mother to pass on guardianship, but that would be easily achieved by presenting the need for it if I do move there. My parents would not bar me from moving out. But they wouldn't much assist me, either.
To begin, I would like to state that the solution has been drawn to simply pass on legal guardianship. That would not legally make us related. Also, to say that I could never marry her, is ignorant. It is a decision of the state.If her mother adopted you, you would be siblings in the eyes of the law, meaning you could never marry her. Why can't you grasp that premise?
http://lawschool.westlaw.com/Quick/famlaw.asp
FURTHER,4. ADOPTED RELATIVES. [�42]
Many states include within a consanguinity statute a prohibition against marriage with a relative by adoption. Where the statute is silent, a court may construe a consanguinity statute to include adopted relatives in light of the strong state interest in treating adopted children the same as natural children.
5. ADOPTED RELATIVES � CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM. [�43]
An argument may be made that inclusion of adopted relatives within the consanguinity ban may violate the adopted person's right to marry under the due process clause or may create a classification violative of the equal protection clause. Since there is no blood relationship between relations by adoption who desire to marry, the state interest in preventing genetic problems in their offspring does not apply. However, the state may still have an interest in promoting family harmony by such a prohibition.
a. Example. An adopted brother and sister, who were not related to each other by blood, were refused a marriage license because state law included adoptive relations within the ban on consanguineous marriages. The Colorado Supreme Court held that the prohibition violated the adopted siblings' rights to equal protection because of the absence of physical detriment to any offspring. Nor does the statute further the state interest in family harmony, since family harmony in this case would be served by allowing the marriage, which was approved by the adoptive parents and their church (See Case Squibs section, Israel v. Allen).
I completely concur. You assume FAR TO MUCH. Where is your source? Why do you think that police would have any authority in this situation?When you enter the Marine Corps, you are not going to be able to argue these little technicalities. As a matter of fact, if you run away and have to get the police involved, the Marines may not even take you.
Tell me, are you in the least knowledgeable about Missouri state law? In many states, including my own, at the age of 17 neither parents nor police have the authority to retrieve a person post departure of their residence. Juvenile Courts, Chapter 211, Sect: 211-021 covers more of this. I would not be considered a runaway, and my parents have already agreed that they would not pursue me.
And, to top it all off... What do you know of the Marine Corps? I will be swearing in by the end of this month. And even if the police did become involved, what makes you think that I would be prosecuted?
Please, tell me, why would I not be able to argue technicalities? You are not my superior commander, and have not proven to me that you know anything about the Marines.
You are making claims without logical proof. I understand that if I did anything -illegal- and was prosecuted for it in court, that my military career could possibly be tarnished. But, in my state, it is not illegal.
CURRENTLY STANDING QUESTIONS:
- How would my mother go about transferring parental guardianship?
- Do my state laws regarding moving out hold when I leave state? For how long?
Why such personal attacks? This is a question of manipulation. How might I manipulate the law in order to achieve what I want.
This is not a question of will I or won't I impregnate someone, nor my moral or ethical beliefs, nor my parents responsibilities. This is not a question of "would we be sisters."
This is a question of... what is the safest way for me to live with my girlfriend's mother, granting her the ability to make medical decisions on my behalf should I be unable, and protecting her from being sued by my insurance companies in the case of an accident.