can he prevent me from moving?

[haiku]

WAIT....What part of my LEGAL advice was incorrect??? I TOLD her that he has the right to contest and under what reasons and what "COULD" happen as far as her having to possibly pay the difference in transportation. I also told her that it was by no means GUARANTEED that if he contested he would win .... there's no GUARANTEE that he would lose either, but we ALL know that here on this forum, we cannot predict what a judge will or will not do. I also told her that her seemingly instability of moving COULD work against her. So again I ask YOU LDIJ what part of that LEGAL advice was incorrect?

Do I hope that her ex files against her? Yeah I do and just for the record... I don't FALL into the traps set by other posters, not to mention why say 'other poster'? EVERYONE here knows you are talking about rmet!!! I disagree with her just as quickly as I disagree with you so DO NOT GO THERE!!! However what I HOPE happens, what does happen and what LEGAL CAN happen do not always mesh and I am VERY careful to make it clear what the difference is so DO NOT come here and indicate that this poster was not given the correct legal advice... at least NOT by me!!!

THIS.
********

 

[Inquiry123]

flygrl I honest think that you would be better off not asking for advice on this forum any longer.

Go somewhere else or rely on your attorney's advice. I have never believed that you have gotten a fair shake here....or that you even get valid legal adivce here. (sorry Tig and others...I think that you all fell into a "trap" set by another poster)

You need objective advice and I don't believe its possible for you to get objective advice here.

Tigger fell into a "trap"?! Are you volunteering for P.E.T.A.?

flygrl: Hey, did you put me on the Watch List?! I've been getting strip-searched everytime I try to get on a plane, lately. Take me off "the list", please.

You won't have any problem moving -- advise the court and your ex 60-days in advance (in writing.) Enjoy Disney World.

Anyhow...what ever happened as far as the child support order that was dragging on? Give us THE JUICE!

 

[GrowUp!]

It doesn't matter WHY he moved. If the man had loved his children - he would have taken steps to get custody from me.

So because of that half-assed theory, he doesn't love his children huh? You're a moron.

That is what I would have done for my children if I really believed the other parent was unsuitable.

Well you don't get to decide that, psycho/.

At the very least, I would have stayed close by with joint custody so that I could make sure my children were ok.

Half-assed theory count: 2 for 2.

I would have recorded the alleged harassment and presented it in court.

And that would get you what?! Laughed at? Plus, the recording can easily be dismissed. That is IF the Court would even hear it. Unlikely not.

Maybe because there was no harassment on my part.

Still believing this steaming pile of crap huh? What you were doing IS against your company's policy and you made your company vulnerable to a lawsuit. Not to mention a lawsuit against you as well.

 

[GrowUp!]

You apparently only come here to tear people down and make yourself feel better. I have no need to do that to other people. I am confident of myself and my parenting.

Dont forget to add the following to your "list:
1. using company computers to stalk ex-husband, against company policy
2. making ish up.

 

[GrowUp!]

flygrl I honest think that you would be better off not asking for advice on this forum any longer.

Go somewhere else or rely on your attorney's advice. I have never believed that you have gotten a fair shake here....or that you even get valid legal adivce here. (sorry Tig and others...I think that you all fell into a "trap" set by another poster)

You need objective advice and I don't believe its possible for you to get objective advice here.

WTH LdiJ??!! what in the hell was wrong with the legal advice Tig gave her?? Whatever woman.

 

[LdiJ]

I need to apologize to Tig....because I really did word that poorly. I didn't intend to imply that her legal advice was incorrect. I intended to imply that I felt she had formed a bad opinion of this OP, unfairly.

I happen to believe that this OP has not received a fair shake from this forum.

I have reviewed her prior posts on more than one occasion, and I have formed a different opinon than everyone else.

I believe that she is dealing with a heartless and nasty ex, whose wife does not believe that the children are morally her husband's children, even if they are legally (adopted). In fact, I don't believe that her ex even WANTS the kids, and is only having contact with them because he has to pay child support.

However, the truth of the matter is that no judge is going to make her stay in the Cincinnati area when dad lives in CA.

 

[stealth2]

I have reviewed her prior posts on more than one occasion, and I have formed a different opinon than everyone else.

Just for the sake of argument.... why is your opinion any less biased than anyone else's?

 

[tigger22472]

I need to apologize to Tig....because I really did word that poorly. I didn't intend to imply that her legal advice was incorrect. I intended to imply that I felt she had formed a bad opinion of this OP, unfairly

But that is NOT what you said. What you told this poster. You told her:

have never believed that you have gotten a fair shake here....or that you even get valid legal adivce here. (sorry Tig and others...I think that you all fell into a "trap" set by another poster)

I happen to believe that this OP has not received a fair shake from this forum.

And that is your OPINION. As Stealth stated, what makes your think that your opinion is any more valid than anyone else's here? Is it because you proclaim to be an expert in more fields than is humanly possible? You seem to be very opinionate here also.. I just want to know why we should value what YOU think and your opinon over someone else's.

I have reviewed her prior posts on more than one occasion, and I have formed a different opinon than everyone else.

K.. different 'than everyone else.' That would mean you are the lone survivor eh? Maybe THAT should tell you something.

I believe that she is dealing with a heartless and nasty ex, whose wife does not believe that the children are morally her husband's children, even if they are legally (adopted). In fact, I don't believe that her ex even WANTS the kids, and is only having contact with them because he has to pay child support.

And you have come to this conclusion based solely on only what she has said.. yet by YOUR words 'Everyone' else on this board has read it differently. Are you an expert on 'heartless and nasty ex's" ? What you believe doesn't matter, we don't necessarily go on what we believe in the 'legal world' now do we? I mean as an attorney aren't we often told that it doesn't matter if we believe someone is guilty or innocent? It's all about the facts. The fact is this poster has had several posts in which she has shown a pattern of attempting to stick it to her ex and alienate him as much as possible. I am not saying that I think her ex is a saint but neither is this woman. Why is she any different than the other parents that come here asking how to alienate the other parent more? Why is she any different than any other parent that comes here and shows their 'true' colors and feelings when it comes to her ex?

However, the truth of the matter is that no judge is going to make her stay in the Cincinnati area when dad lives in CA.

And you DO NOT know this FOR a fact! I can think of at least ONE reason why a judge could order her to stay in the area...I'll let you ponder on that for a bit.

You are not the know all and end all of this board. You do not know everything and here lately you've even been failing to read ( I know of at least twice in the last week) and have argued to either give INCORRECT advice or moot advice. And now you say "oops.." you worded something wrong... No you didn't.. you worded it exactly as you thought it to be and it took you 1/2 a day to try to figure out how to fix the mess you made when you fell off your high horse!

Maybe you should stick to what you really DO know...and not what you CLAIM to know. I bet we would hear a lot less from you. Geezzz.. wouldn't that be a joy! Oh wait... was I stating a bias opinion... Dang it.. I really should work on that... Eh.... Maybe later

 

[stealth2]

(sorry Tig and others...I think that you all fell into a "trap" set by another poster)

I meant to address this last night, but got sidetracked. This is totally insulting coming from you, LDi. If ANYONE on these boards consistently falls into "traps" set by another poster, it's you. You consistently fall into the same trap rmet sets and get into the same assinine arguments with her. So don't go casting stones before clearing your own front yard.

 

[LdiJ]

Ok...look...I have apologized to Tig. I honestly did not mean that the way it came off.

I have a different opinion than many others here regarding this poster. That does not make my opinion any more important or any more valid than anyone else's opinion...or vice versa.

However....its obvious that this poster isn't going to get any actual help here, because everyone has formed an opinion and aren't going to change that opinion. Which is completely NORMAL. So, I suggested that she go elsewhere for advice.

 

[Inquiry123]

However....its obvious that this poster isn't going to get any actual help here, because everyone has formed an opinion and aren't going to change that opinion. Which is completely NORMAL. So, I suggested that she go elsewhere for advice.

And simply changing her posting moniker for a fresh start would not work because...?

 

[Rushia]

And simply changing her posting moniker for a fresh start would not work because...?

Because she tried that and screwed it up.

 

[haiku]

Ok...look...I have apologized to Tig. I honestly did not mean that the way it came off.

I have a different opinion than many others here regarding this poster. That does not make my opinion any more important or any more valid than anyone else's opinion...or vice versa.

However....its obvious that this poster isn't going to get any actual help here, because everyone has formed an opinion and aren't going to change that opinion. Which is completely NORMAL. So, I suggested that she go elsewhere for advice.

you are not the first one to tell her that you know. you are not unique (but maybe for your interpretation)

I have been doing it for a year now.

And, due to the fact she keeps coming back I can only assume one thing.....

She is a TROLL, and we all know you shouldn't. feed. the. troll.

 

[tigger22472]

You keep saying this...

I honestly did not mean that the way it came off.

But then you keep saying this...

However....its obvious that this poster isn't going to get any actual help here, because everyone has formed an opinion and aren't going to change that opinion. Which is completely NORMAL. So, I suggested that she go elsewhere for advice.

I don't HAVE to like this poster, it is not a requirement. However, that does not mean that she does not get 'actual help' unless you mean she doesn't get told what she wants to hear, and if that's the case 1/2 the people that come here don't get 'actual help.' This poster is/was given the legal information so how you can say she doesn't get any actual help is BS.

You're probably better off keeping your mouth shut LDIJ... every time you open it you insert your foot.

 

[GrowUp!]

The thing is flycase...I mean flygrl has been given proper advice before. But she is like so many others that come on here looking for legal advice...they get it and when they see it's not what they wanted to hear, they get pissed off, start adding information they didn't reveal at the start, etc thinking it'll get them what they want to hear. Flygrl is no different.