Wow, this site hates me. It didn't work yesterday on my phone, I did type more details, so I'm sorry for the confusion, and I just typed a lengthy reply and it didn't post and I'm on a desktop
.
I was trying to say that in an unmarried situation, just signing the AOP doesn't give dad legal custody rights. Some unmarried parents don't get that...they might think that because dad is on the bc, he can just come take the child if he should choose to do so. When stepmom took me to court (oops, I mean dad
) there was a form that was necessary to fill out, waiving testing, declaring paternity, and the filing was to establish paternity, custody, and child support. Legally, the AOP was sufficient for the state to have him pay back medicaid costs the first year of birth, but it isn't sufficient for further use as far as custody. The OP might not understand the difference. Actually, I'm positive she does not.
My paperwork was back in 2004, so it could have changed, but since OP won't write the state of birth who knows where she is talking about. I don't believe she didn't know what she was signing...how on earth did Dad's name get on the forms if she was just handed a mysterious pile of papers to sign? I hate when people play musical daddies...I was adopted by my stepdad in 5th grade. I do have a good relationship with my bio but that whole situation sucked. My daughter has had my husband as step since she was 2, I never tried to replace dad even when he was less than stellar. Adoption is misused in many of these cases and it can devastate a child to know that their parent signed them away like they were a car with transmission problems to someone else because it was too much trouble to deal with.
I had a lot more to say but I'm tired of typing, this is my 5th attempt and I'm giving up, lol.