cschwies, now that I understand that you were playing with us I'll accept that you were talking about a case you were involved in already, and that you won.
However, the statements you are making on this thread are entirely too broad to be seen as accurate and you can't expect people not to point that out.
As I said, we can only make judgements based on the information we have. Obviously your attorney had far more information than we have. I say again, on the basis of the information you have provided to us, you did not have a case. The only information you provide does not support a case of illegal discrimination.
Please note that I word my posts deliberately. When I say that you, or someone, does not have a case on the basis of the facts in their post, I mean exactly that. It does not mean that you have no case; it means that the information you have provided us does not support the case you claim.
Let's everyone calm down a bit. This was a slightly misguided practical joke and hasn't done anyone any harm.