• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Frustrated custodial parents wants a change in custody

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

thndrnsnow

Junior Member
LdiJ said:
If each of you have one child...then there may not be any child support owed either direction. It depends on your respective incomes.

Because my income is much greater than his my share of "total" support is higher than his. I think it is something like 75% me and 25% him. Which is why I never had such a major problem with him missing a payment here and there. I think that I would still be required to pay him support.

What I would do is calculate the CS that you would owe dad for one child, and the CS that dad would owe you for one child**************....and then try to agree that dad will pay you the child support for one child, and that any amount due to him would be deducted from the arrearages until they are used up. When the arrearages are used up, you can revisit the issue of child support.....asumming that the older child isn't a legal adult by then.
This was exactly what I was thinking. I had no intention of just forgiving his obligations on a whole...just thinking that the money I would normally be required to pay him would be deducted from his arreages. There is no sense in him sending me money for one child, me sending him money for the other child and then him sending extra to cover a portion of the back support he has accumulated over the years. That just gets too confusing in the shear number of transactions that occur.
 


thndrnsnow

Junior Member
Ohiogal said:
This is going to be a concern to the judge -- you want your child to go live with someone who has not paid support in over two years and who -- if served with documents outlining his legal responsibilities and trying to enforce such -- would walk away from his kids. Yet you think this man having custody of a minor child is in the best interest of said minor child? I think the judge would have a very hard time approving any shared agreement with those facts.
What we are trying to do is make the most out of a difficult situation. Just because his father missed support payments over the years does not make him an abusive or neglectful father to the point that he cannot care for his son now. When he missed payments he was struggling financially and has always promised to make up any missed payments. And as of late he has made the effort to do so by sending a little extra each month.

I could certainly get upset each and every time he doesn't call when I think he should, or when he missed payments or when he chose to do something I would not personally agree should have priority over our children. I could have hired a lawyer and taken the matter before the courts each and every time. But as I said I firmly believe the parent child relationship is more important than the money. Keeping the peace between all members involved has worked better for us than constant legal battles that could have taken place.

I have several male friends who are on the other end of the playing field where they have children in which they are the non-custodial parent. This in no way is meant to be stereotypical of all fathers but the ones I have discussed my situation with have gotten me to realize they are not all bad fathers just because they are not there on a daily basis. "Out of site out of mind" is one term I could use to explain some of their behaviors. While they love their children very much and they enjoy spending time with them and they know the right thing to do is financially and emotionally support their children, it is easy to live their day to day lives living in the moment. If the child is not in front of them right then and there they focus their attention on those things that are. Maybe that is just my way of looking for the good in the situation instead of focusing on the negatives.

Another point I would like to make is....we as people and as parents all grow as we are go through life. While my ex has done some things I think are personally irresponsible when it comes to our children like not being around all the time and not putting the kids before every other thing in his life I have seen a path of improvement and growth. His fatherly responsibilities have improved over the years. Had I taken him to court and constantly criticized him at every turn of the road I could have pushed him away to the point that he was ready to throw in the towel. Instead he is still around now and willing to step up to the plate and do what he can to help our son who is having difficulties.

My sister was in a similar situation. Her ex did not pay support as he should have. She would hire a lawyer, take him to court, the judge would order him to pay and just as the garnishments were getting setup he would quit his job and move on to the next one. He worked in construction so it was easier for him to find a job where he got paid under the table, etc. For 15 years my sister spent so much time in court and so much money on attorney fees to try to get the support the kids were owed. Needless to say when her oldest child was just shy of his 18th b-day the father died with a debt of 45K in back support. Her boys did not even want to visit their father in the hospital or attend the funeral because of what they had seen their mother go through. The legal battles over money torn apart what should have been a loving relationship between father and child. I am not saying what the father did was right. I firmly believe non-custodial parents should pay support and they should be in their children's lives everyday. I just think some things deserve forgiveness and some things are more important than money.
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
While I dont argue with your sentiments LEGALLY a judge is not going to be happy for the reasons I stated. JUDGES do not like custody switched when a parent is in arrears -- especially not when a parent threatens to walk away if you legally try to do something about it. I have seen many judges who feel that that is no where near the best interest of the child. And that is something you are going to have to prove to the court even if you have an agreed entry. The judge will need some understanding of why your agreement is thought to be in the best interest.
While you want dad in the kids' lives, he needs to be more mature and not act like a child. Such behavior is NOT in the best interest of any child.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top