xylene
Senior Member
They are tenants by virtue of the duration of their tenancy, not by paying rent.I still do not understand how they can be tenants without paying rent?!
They are tenants by virtue of the duration of their tenancy, not by paying rent.I still do not understand how they can be tenants without paying rent?!
Actually, they are tenants by the nature of their residency, not by the length of their stay. Tenancy can be established the same day a person moves in...or one could be a "guest" for months and months.They are tenants by virtue of the duration of their tenancy, not by paying rent.
That's a very important clarification.Actually, they are tenants by the nature of their residency, not by the length of their stay. Tenancy can be established the same day a person moves in...or one could be a "guest" for months and months.
Hello all,If he sells the house, he's going to be homeless...
Now, as a new member of the forum, I would love to continue the arguments!The salient fact is his girlfriend has lived their for "years and years."
Honestly y'all have an argument how she / the kids are guests under the law?
Your brother has allowed them to move in...they're not squatters.Now, as a new member of the forum, I would love to continue the arguments!
Squatter
An individual who settles on the land of another person without any legal authority to do so, or without acquiring a legal title.
In the past, the term squatter specifically applied to an individual who settled on public land. Currently it is used interchangeably with intruder and trespasser.
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
SQUATTER. One who settles on the lands of others without any legal authority; this term is applied particularly to persons who settle on the public land. 3 Mart. N. S. 293.
A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
I still feel that the "family" at least are squatters.
There is no such thing as "common law" marriage in AZ. Arizona will recognize common law marriages that were created in other states, but that doesn't apply here.The GF could try to argue Common law wife, but I am not sure of the time factors in AZ.
Allowed them. As guests, not permanent residents. And not all at once. Not sure but I think there are currently six couples, at least one teenager and at least one baby. Then we get into the relatives that wouldn't leave.Your brother has allowed them to move in...they're not squatters.
There is no such thing as "common law" marriage in AZ. Arizona will recognize common law marriages that were created in other states, but that doesn't apply here.
There is no quiz: the only law that applies in your brother's situation is AZ law.Your brother has allowed them to move in...they're not squatters.
I remember a court case of landlord v. tenants. The landlord leased the home to the tenants, in essence inviting them in. The landlord lived in another state and depended on a management company to take care of the home.
After some time the landlord realized the tenants were no longer paying rent. The management company was gone. The tenants simply quit paying rent. After 9 months of no rent the landlord flew out. He had filed 30 day notices but no response.
They all ended up in court. The landlord requesting all the back rent. The tenants refusing on the grounds they had had no heat over the long winter.
Who won & why?
Weren't expecting a quiz, eh
Silverplum,There is no quiz: the only law that applies in your brother's situation is AZ law.
Funny, the Man always wins-almost. The point was that the tenants were deemed squatters due to non-payment of rent. This is a real case. I don't recall all the particulars except it was heard in Civil Court. I was researching another case in the Law library and found it. Many years ago. When we still read booksThe LL won. The tenants didn't give proper notice in regards to the heat.
And ... the LL gave proper notice.
(Again, this is what your brother should do.)