• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

just wondering in IN

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

ptrc

Member
Mbarr77 said:
Poster: In what IAAL has quoted are you not asking if you can get supervised visitation for the EX, who you say is a criminal and if not supervised visitation then maybe YOU can get sole custody?

Yes. everyone else seems to understand it. That is exactly what I asked.
I was talking about my ex all along. I have joint custody with him now and I am the custodial parent.
 


weenor

Senior Member
Iaal

ptrc said:
My ex has alot of criminal issues. He is an alcoholic , has had 3 owi offenses, 2 seperate charges of contributing to a minor, receiving of stolen property which is still on the back burner. All of this except 2 of the OWI's has occurred within the last 5 months. So far, they have just given him a slap on the wrist. I WAS SHOCKED!!!! He has given my son, who is nine, marajuana, and alcohol. We had him tested and reported it to cps, but the tests came out negative. With only small amounts, they said it may not show. Even did hair testing. Negative, said possibly done to early. He has came back with bruises. Reported and took pictures, however nothing was done. He has seen my ex in sexual situations as well as other people his father knows. There is documentation with cps for that. Do I possibly have enough to eventually get at least supervised visitations if not full custody? Right now we share joint custody.I thought in Indiana it was, three times you're out deal with alcohol related issues applied. Is there anything I can do to keep my son from going thru anymore? My son is depressed with anxiety and has been diagnosed with ADHD. Safety is a big concern.
The bolded portion was perhaps added in at the edit and you didn't see it after the edit, but this is the reason people are responding...
 

ptrc

Member
weenor said:
The bolded portion was perhaps added in at the edit and you didn't see it after the edit, but this is the reason people are responding...

I was wanting my husband to have the supervised visitations and I want full custody instead of joint because of his issues. Did not realize people would take it that way.
 

ptrc

Member
ptrc said:
I was wanting my husband to have the supervised visitations and I want full custody instead of joint because of his issues. Did not realize people would take it that way.
I changed it. Hopefully this sounds clearer. LITIGATION: I apologize for the misunderstanding. I did not realize it sounded that way. Now maybe I will not be misunderstood.
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
I read it the way it was original and I always did take it that she was looking to get supervised visitation for her ex.. not herself. I understood exactly what she was saying from the beginning.

OP, I have sent you the information in PM... hope it helps.
 

ptrc

Member
tigger22472 said:
I read it the way it was original and I always did take it that she was looking to get supervised visitation for her ex.. not herself. I understood exactly what she was saying from the beginning.

OP, I have sent you the information in PM... hope it helps.

Yes I did get the info. Thank you so much. You have been a BIG help. Thanks for getting my situation the first time. You are very sweet. Thanks again. Gotta go. Talk to you soon.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top