Yes, I understand that. When we divorced we didn't use lawyers and didn't know all this legal speak. I was asking for further clarification on the first poster that had a long reply that seemed angry at the way this was handled. What I took offense to was people judging me when I was the person wronged here. I did everything right by this women, raised her child, helped her out of jams financially and emotionally and then she cheated on me and we cut ties. The reason I feel she owes her share was a moral one, not a legal one. My question was simply does the agreement hold water legally, in case her morals went out the window. Apparently it does not hold up legally, which is fine. But why are people calling me sleazy and saying what I did is equal to her cheating on me and blowing the best thing her daughter ever had? I understand the legality of the issue now, but you guys are making me out to be a bad guy here when I am so far from it. I was in love with this woman and for whatever reason she blew it and I'm stuck paying a debt settlement that we went into together (not legally), and all I want is for her to do the morally right thing and pay her share. She told me she intends to and I'm hoping she does. The reason I came here was to see if she decides she doesn't want to honor her promise (not legally) do I have any legal recourse. I know now that I don't. This woman completely screwed me over in many ways, not all mentioned here and I want her to do the right thing by me. It would be a no brainer for me to do the right thing in her shoes, I'm probably too nice and trusting a guy, but that's my fault I guess. The bottom line is I believe the white knight she met after we split up is telling her not to pay me, and part of that is because she told him many lies about me just like she told me about her ex before me. I don't understand why I am being called sleazy for trying to repair my life after an atomic bomb of a woman dropped on me.