RemitAdvice
Member
Smh
According to the attorney, these are the facts:
1) The validity of the marriage, since the ceremony was performed in CA, needs to be confirmed IN CA, not VA since VA 'Since Virginia gives full faith and credit to the laws of other states'. (He went on to give some other examples.)
a)Upon further investigation the original VA license that was taken and signed off on in CA was returned WITH the newlyweds to VA and they themselves turned it into New Kent County Courthouse. I did call the county (and the city) that they were married in in CA and no record of ANY marriage was found involving those two.
2) The Fraud issue and putative spouse: " Generally, for fraud, the parties must have a specific intent to defraud, that is, they must KNOW that what they are doing is wrong. However, for certain federal benefits, intent it not required and refunds may be required if the status is incorrectly stated on applications. I doubt, under the circumstances, that there would ever be any criminal investigation because there is a "putative" marriage. The refund of benefits question would be more a question of whether the applicable agency felt it was worth pursuing."
3) His final word to to suggest that if there were significant assets or disputes to be resolved they could file a suit with the Commonwealth to Affirm or Annul the marriage and that would confirm their marital status.
Thoughts??
According to the attorney, these are the facts:
1) The validity of the marriage, since the ceremony was performed in CA, needs to be confirmed IN CA, not VA since VA 'Since Virginia gives full faith and credit to the laws of other states'. (He went on to give some other examples.)
a)Upon further investigation the original VA license that was taken and signed off on in CA was returned WITH the newlyweds to VA and they themselves turned it into New Kent County Courthouse. I did call the county (and the city) that they were married in in CA and no record of ANY marriage was found involving those two.
2) The Fraud issue and putative spouse: " Generally, for fraud, the parties must have a specific intent to defraud, that is, they must KNOW that what they are doing is wrong. However, for certain federal benefits, intent it not required and refunds may be required if the status is incorrectly stated on applications. I doubt, under the circumstances, that there would ever be any criminal investigation because there is a "putative" marriage. The refund of benefits question would be more a question of whether the applicable agency felt it was worth pursuing."
3) His final word to to suggest that if there were significant assets or disputes to be resolved they could file a suit with the Commonwealth to Affirm or Annul the marriage and that would confirm their marital status.
Thoughts??