It's always been my understanding that evidence that was available but not used at trial cannot be used to have a judgment overturned or a new trial granted. Am I mistaken?
As I learn more, I am thinking that all information "evidence" to support the claim that granting him full custody is not in the best interest of the child was basically information prior to a year ago when he legitimized her and filed for full custody and the court apparently does not recognize any of it before legitimization.
Summary....without the court involment, they lived together, raising her and even buying a house together for 8 years, shared physical custody 50/50 until she was in middle school, then mutually decided, it would be best that she be with my daughter Mon-Fri for school consistancy...he had her alternate weekends and off school times as much as he wanted. My daughter has a 9-5 in town job, with a only few travel obligations a year, whereas his hours are long and swap night and day. My daughter arranged and paid for after school care, camps, carried health insurance on her as he has none with his job, handled ALL Dr appts, dental/orthodontic visits, school events, teacher conferences, homework...etc.
Myself, my husband and my daughter have tried to convince him to legitimze my ganddaughter for 12 years...his name is on birth certificate, but they never married. The concern being that if something were to happen to my daughter....her only legal guardian...it would not be absolutely clear in the sometimes messed up legal system that he would get custody w/o legitimization and that her status as his heir would not be established.
After separation, he paid his half of childcare, medical expenses for her for a while then stopped. My daughter tried for over a year to work with him outside court on financial obligations and/or inside court on custody, but finally filed for support. The amount the court ruled on was substantially more than
either of them thought, but still she settled for less. Only then did he file for legitimization and custody...at the urging of his new wife with the new baby.
First of all, you guys lost, and they expect losers to be sore. If you jump right back in with another lawyer in the same court system, I'd rate your chances in the neighborhood of VERY POOR to not at all. What is meant by filing in another venue? During the course of the year long
I dont think sore losers is accurate...more in shock that after the history described here, the judge went beyond the summer ruling 50/50 physical/legal custody, with father paying only his half of insurance/ medical/ dental to father having full physical custody, joint legal with him having final say on everything and her paying him. Different venue meaning refile in different court system vs appeal.