Really?? Again??

[Ray82]

Not legally, sweetcheeks. In the legal arena? You're no one. The more you butt in? The more you risk your wife's custody.

I never mentioned trying anything in any legal arena.

I used plural pronouns in a post to explain a situation about police escorts in a location I shared with another individual on a forum.

 

[ecmst12]

You're also hijacking Isis' post.

 

[Ray82]

You're also hijacking Isis' post.

acmb asked if you can even do a police escort and what's the point. I was giving a REAL example with REAL information.

Not some BS semantic highlighting with BS information that makes no sense.

I wasn't asking for advise... and pardon me for maybe assuming... but I didn't see Isis asking for advise either.

 

[CJane]

I know, different state, but just for perspective on the police escort/enforcement issue...

452.425. Any court order for the custody of, or visitation with, a child may include a provision that the sheriff or other law enforcement officer shall enforce the rights of any person to custody or visitation unless the court issues a subsequent order pursuant to chapter* 210, 211, 452 or 455, RSMo, to limit or deny the custody of, or visitations with, the child. Such sheriff or law enforcement officer shall not remove a child from a person who has actual physical custody of the child unless such sheriff or officer is shown a court order or judgment which clearly and convincingly verifies that such person is not entitled to the actual physical custody of the child, and there are not other exigent circumstances that would give the sheriff or officer reasonable suspicion to believe that the child would be harmed or that the court order presented to the sheriff or officer may not be valid.

The above is in every MO order I've ever seen. No, I haven't seen them all... but it's pretty boiler plate.

And the one time I needed to enforce my time with the kids - years ago - I called the Sheriff's department and a deputy called ahead and spoke to ex, and explained they WOULD enforce the issue. They then arrived at ex's house at about the same time I did, went to the door and asked him if he intended to withhold the children, again explaining that they had a duty to enforce the order. He did not choose to withhold them, so all was well.

But - sometimes - even though it's a civil matter, the police/sheriff's office is required to enforce a custody order.

 

[CourtClerk]

I was giving a REAL example with REAL information.

Was it a real example of what really happens in Southern California???

 

[Ray82]

Was it a real example of what really happens in Southern California???

Maybe.

EDIT: But what's the difference with what I did and what CJane just did with the exclusion of some angry individual that always posts ugly on every thread throwing it into an arguement to argue a point no one was even trying to make?

 

[CourtClerk]

Maybe.

No is closer to the truth than maybe is....

EDIT: But what's the difference with what I did and what CJane just did with the exclusion of some angry individual that always posts ugly on every thread throwing it into an arguement to argue a point no one was even trying to make?

CJane and the rest of us probably know more about this situation than most of us probably care to. You however, do not.... nor do you know about what goes on in So. Cal.

 

[Ray82]

No is closer to the truth than maybe is....

CJane and the rest of us probably know more about this situation than most of us probably care to. You however, do not.... nor do you know about what goes on in So. Cal.

Why do you have to argue about it? She posted information about MO. I posted a situation about TN (The location of the person that asked probably the only question relating to custody in this entire thread.)

Isis didn't ask for help in that. Someone from Tennessee did. Are you saying MO information is more relative to Tennesee than Tennessee information?

Or that MO is more relative to California than TN?

I don't get why we are even argueing about it other than stealth2 pointing out some pronouns to start an arguement.

 

[stealth2]

Ok lets quit with the bullcrap ok.

Good idea - you can start, acme. (And yes, I do know it's acmb. Consider acme my pet name for you. )

 

[Proserpina]

Come on guys - this isn't helping Isis at all.

Group hug everyone?

I'll serve up some ice-cream too.

 

[mistoffolees]

Good idea - you can start, acme. (And yes, I do know it's acmb. Consider acme my pet name for you. )

Every time I see 'Acme', I think Wile E. Coyote.

It was just a suggestion. There is no reason to jump down someones throat for wording a sentence a certain way. It is childish and immature to do it without at least asking a question first or informing them in a nice way. If they then want to argue it so be it.

To immediately just act like an ass to a poster because they happen to say we when talking about a spouse makes whoever does it look like a moron.

You make a good point. I try not to jump on someone simply for using the word 'we', but a pretty large percentage of the time, they really ARE overstepping their boundaries - and then deserve it.

The other problem with 'we' is its ambiguity. Is it Dad and Mom? Dad and Stepmom? Mom and kid? It's often hard to tell.

 

[Antigone*]

Come on guys - this isn't helping Isis at all.

Group hug everyone?

I'll serve up some ice-cream too.

Hey, I just got here and I'm thrilled to see our friend averted a crisis, that a newbie's been put in his place by stealth, and Wile E. Coyote has made an appearance.

Screw the ice cream Greek Goddess, make mine a marketini

 

[Proserpina]

Hey, I just got here and I'm thrilled to see our friend averted a crisis, that a newbie's been put in his place by stealth, and Wile E. Coyote has made an appearance.

Screw the ice cream Greek Goddess, make mine a marketini

I'm on it.

I got a good 70% of my Christmas shopping done today....I'm going to put my feet up and have a glass of something nice and cold.

Cheers

 

[Isis1]

Oh good heavens. I should have locked the thread!

I just hate tattling on the ex. It's the only way he'll follow the law. Turns out, kids were at his mom's (where there is a court order stating they are not allowed to be) since he was working his graveyard shift (which he told the minor's attorney he wasn't working) aside from the confusion of all week the kids asking me if they were spending the birthday with me, then finding out over text the kids weren't even with dad. Ugh. Which means, i may have to go for contempt anyway.

But, for tonight, i'm just going to drink my cherry rum and coke, and stare at the wall....

 

[stealth2]

Sorry, hon - some folks just rub me the wrong way. And I didn't like how my new "friend" responded to you.