Litigator22
Active Member
"Main tenant"?
I don't know what the "rental office" means by that fictitious term, but it clearly acknowledges that there is more than one tenant on the lease.
And unless the lease agreement specifies otherwise - in order for the landlord to comply with Massachusetts law - any refund due should be made payable to all named tenants. (MGL Ch. 186 Section 15B(4)
Yet again if push turns to shove there is a way to ensure that you obtain any benefits due via the rental deposit. Holding over for one month would force the landlord to credit the deposit for the month of August.
But getting back to the utilities for July. Don't let your decisions or actions on the subject be influenced by the fact that those services are contracted under your sole name. Such an argument is totally specious. As groundless as proposing that your roommate is entitled to be reimbursed for what she has paid to date.
I don't know what the "rental office" means by that fictitious term, but it clearly acknowledges that there is more than one tenant on the lease.
And unless the lease agreement specifies otherwise - in order for the landlord to comply with Massachusetts law - any refund due should be made payable to all named tenants. (MGL Ch. 186 Section 15B(4)
Yet again if push turns to shove there is a way to ensure that you obtain any benefits due via the rental deposit. Holding over for one month would force the landlord to credit the deposit for the month of August.
But getting back to the utilities for July. Don't let your decisions or actions on the subject be influenced by the fact that those services are contracted under your sole name. Such an argument is totally specious. As groundless as proposing that your roommate is entitled to be reimbursed for what she has paid to date.