Why is this happening?

[Halls]

What does your waistline - or #1nana's - have to do with anything?

Have you ever misspelled a word on accident stealth or are you perfect? I had a 4 year old sitting in my lap when I typed that and wasn't thinking about it.

 

[Halls]

I am aware of the whole without a court order thing, but my understanding from reading this was that some people were advising that Mom didn't have to agree to a temp order or something like that. Uggh...my heads spinning...

Actually you are still wrong. Mom didn't have to agree to any order. If she turned in down dad could have taken it into court and the judge could have made the order.

 

[AHA]

I highly doubt anyone on this board is spotless enough to throw stones.

Think again, mama

 

[BelizeBreeze]

This entire thread is getting stupid.

The fact is, there is a temporary order in place until a formal hearing can be held. That temp order allows 16 hours a week of visitation. The fact that the parties are not married and there has been no administrative and/or judicial determination of paternity is at a minimum a BIG advantage to the supposed father of the child.

what could have or should have or might have is a bunch of crap and doesn't belong in a legal factual discussion.

 

[#1nana]

This entire thread is getting stupid.

The fact is, there is a temporary order in place until a formal hearing can be held. That temp order allows 16 hours a week of visitation. The fact that the parties are not married and there has been no administrative and/or judicial determination of paternity is at a minimum a BIG advantage to the supposed father of the child.

what could have or should have or might have is a bunch of crap and doesn't belong in a legal factual discussion.

This entire thread is getting stupid.

The fact is, there is a temporary order in place until a formal hearing can be held. That temp order allows 16 hours a week of visitation. The fact that the parties are not married and there has been no administrative and/or judicial determination of paternity is at a minimum a BIG advantage to the supposed father of the child.

what could have or should have or might have is a bunch of crap and doesn't belong in a legal factual discussion.

You are absolutely right. This thread is getting stupid.

To anyone who posted a response relevent to the current situation, thank you very much.

To the poster of the unneccessary name-calling, if you are an attorney, you are obviously not a very good one. When you come at people sideways, like you did to me with your childish names, you deserve to get your a** handed to you. You posted 2 things: opinionated garbage with no relevence to the current situation and repeats of what other posters wrote. Have a nice day, Sugar!