ProSeDadinMD
Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? See my name…
Here’s the “back-story” on this particular issue for those interested.
https://forum.freeadvice.com/child-custody-visitation-37/does-need-clarified-386217.html
The Readers Digest condensed version:
Court in April 2007 adding vacation and holidays. No mention of anybody’s birthday.
In 2007, I didn’t see Little Miss Pro Se on my birthday, as The Ex and I didn’t communicate well(this was just about as much my fault as hers). For The Ex’s birthday, I got an email stating that LMPS would be with her on hers(it fell on one of my midweek overnight visits). I didn’t object to it, although I did point out the fiasco surrounding mine.
I never filed for clarification. I had hoped that we could behave like adults, and we’d just been to court.
In 2008, The Ex was dead set against me seeing Little Miss Pro Se on my birthday, and it took a full weeks worth of emails between us, with me pointing out several times the email sent by The Ex in ’07 regarding her birthday, before she finally relented. I had LMPS overnight on my birthday, and The Ex had her on hers(LMPS was normally scheduled to be with her in ’08).
Now comes 2009. Because I responded in the negative(I said no, and explained my reason why) to an email from The Ex in which she told me that I would be “require”d to “forego” my holiday time at Thanksgiving so that she could travel out of state to see the family of a friend, I am now again being told that either I return Little Miss Pro Se at an unreasonably early hour(especially considering the 2 hour round trip to pick LMPS up, and then to return her), or she “will keep her for an overnight the Friday after Thanksgiving”. Regarding Thanksgiving, the order states that this year, I will have LMPS from 5pm on Friday thru 5pm on Sunday, at which time we revert to the normal schedule. This year, The Ex’s birthday falls on a day she would already have LMPS. Again, multiple emails on the subject, and I've pointed out the issues of the last 2 years in my responses.
3 years of this kind of BS is enough.
Before the end of this week, I will be filing a motion to clarify this whole birthday situation. It’ll benefit everybody to do so, and Status Quo is on my side of this.
2 Questions:
1) As our birthdays aren’t listed in the order at all, but are now established via Status Quo, any opinions on severity of ding I might take for keeping our daughter this evening?
2) Is me not responding to her threat to keep LMPS after Thanksgiving a tacit agreement? As it stands now, my thought is that it would be contempt.
She also seems to think we need to go to mediation over birthdays….What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
Here’s the “back-story” on this particular issue for those interested.
https://forum.freeadvice.com/child-custody-visitation-37/does-need-clarified-386217.html
The Readers Digest condensed version:
Court in April 2007 adding vacation and holidays. No mention of anybody’s birthday.
In 2007, I didn’t see Little Miss Pro Se on my birthday, as The Ex and I didn’t communicate well(this was just about as much my fault as hers). For The Ex’s birthday, I got an email stating that LMPS would be with her on hers(it fell on one of my midweek overnight visits). I didn’t object to it, although I did point out the fiasco surrounding mine.
I never filed for clarification. I had hoped that we could behave like adults, and we’d just been to court.
In 2008, The Ex was dead set against me seeing Little Miss Pro Se on my birthday, and it took a full weeks worth of emails between us, with me pointing out several times the email sent by The Ex in ’07 regarding her birthday, before she finally relented. I had LMPS overnight on my birthday, and The Ex had her on hers(LMPS was normally scheduled to be with her in ’08).
Now comes 2009. Because I responded in the negative(I said no, and explained my reason why) to an email from The Ex in which she told me that I would be “require”d to “forego” my holiday time at Thanksgiving so that she could travel out of state to see the family of a friend, I am now again being told that either I return Little Miss Pro Se at an unreasonably early hour(especially considering the 2 hour round trip to pick LMPS up, and then to return her), or she “will keep her for an overnight the Friday after Thanksgiving”. Regarding Thanksgiving, the order states that this year, I will have LMPS from 5pm on Friday thru 5pm on Sunday, at which time we revert to the normal schedule. This year, The Ex’s birthday falls on a day she would already have LMPS. Again, multiple emails on the subject, and I've pointed out the issues of the last 2 years in my responses.
3 years of this kind of BS is enough.
Before the end of this week, I will be filing a motion to clarify this whole birthday situation. It’ll benefit everybody to do so, and Status Quo is on my side of this.
2 Questions:
1) As our birthdays aren’t listed in the order at all, but are now established via Status Quo, any opinions on severity of ding I might take for keeping our daughter this evening?
2) Is me not responding to her threat to keep LMPS after Thanksgiving a tacit agreement? As it stands now, my thought is that it would be contempt.
She also seems to think we need to go to mediation over birthdays….What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?