Quick Question regarding Responisive Declaration

[VyRoses]

Instant evidence that you are not in a position to give valid legal information. Your statement above is simply untrue.


You're in no position to comment.

Keep looking.. The finished statement is the next statement below. It is true. Intangible evidance in a court room is completly overlooked.

 

[Silverplum]

Keep looking.. The finished statement is the next statement below. It is true. Intangible evidance in a court room is completly overlooked.

Whereas that statement may be true, it's NOT the one I said was completely wrong.

It's good to know you don't care about receiving valid legal info -- makes it so much easier for anyone to "answer" your questions.

But take it easy on the other folks who need real help, whydon'tcha?
Giving them inaccurate info is not cool.

 

[Ohiogal]

The majority of advice given here is out of oppinion still. Weather the subject is on 'law' is irrelevant as to who has a right to leave a comment. As long as I have experience on the subject is all that matters in this forum. Is every one in here leaving comments a Lawer? No. Every case is different, your oppinions are still personal judgment.

Your are giving a say on something you have experience with and personally observed, hopefully. You have a belief upon the 'Subject', about what to expect. As do I.

Weather was not the subject. Though the law of weather is different than the law of the courtrooms in different states. I happen to be a lawyer. I don't know of any lawers. Also my opinions are based on the law and what I have seen courts do.

Please return to school in order to learn proper grammar, punctuation and spelling.

 

[mistoffolees]

Wow. You sure managed to be wrong a lot of times in two short posts.

Of course She did... No matter where one lives the 'law' is always the same....

Absolutely, completely wrong. Family law varies immensely from state to state.

The actual implementation of the law also changes from one courtroom to the next.

..If there is no "Tangible" evidince of what is brought up in a court room, it doesn't mean a thing. Family 'law' is always talking about what is 'best for the Child',

No, family law is about the law.

In some states, the law says that decisions should be made based on the best interests of a child, but that doesn't allow the court to completely ignore the law.

I'd like to know how they can determine that if they.. (probably by rule) over look the intangible like Love'... Usually the parent who has the strongest Care & concern for the Childs well being, has a much harder time in court. ...There is something very wrong with that.

Yes, there is something wrong with that statement - it's completely false.

First, the court is there to determine the law, not act like some kind of love meter.

Second, even to the extent that the court must consider intangibles, the judge generally doesn't do so on his own. He evaluated evidence provided by GALs, counselors, etc. AND, when the judge does have to rely on his judgment, the parent who convinces the judge that he/she loves the child and is best able to act in the best interests of the child has the EASIEST time, not the hardest.

The majority of advice given here is out of oppinion still.

Not opinion, interpretation of the law based on experience.

Weather the subject is on 'law' is irrelevant as to who has a right to leave a comment. As long as I have experience on the subject is all that matters in this forum. Is every one in here leaving comments a Lawer? No.

I'm not an attorney. The difference is that I post based on extensive experience and knowledge. AND, I can spell and write proper English sentences.

I really wouldn't advise someone to listen to you about much of anything until you can demonstrate the ability to pass a 7th grade English course.

Every case is different, your oppinions are still personal judgment.

Your are giving a say on something you have experience with and personally observed, hopefully. You have a belief upon the 'Subject', about what to expect. As do I.

The difference is that your belief is completely fabricated out of thin air. The other posters here post information based on knowledge of the law and experience - both of which you lack.

 

[CSO286]

Wow. You sure managed to be wrong a lot of times in two short posts.


<snip>
I'm not an attorney. The difference is that I post based on extensive experience and knowledge. AND, I can spell and write proper English sentences.

I really wouldn't advise someone to listen to you about much of anything until you can demonstrate the ability to pass a 7th grade English course.



The difference is that your belief is completely fabricated out of thin air. The other posters here post information based on knowledge of the law and experience - both of which you lack.

Misto---you rock.

Whenever I get so frustrated with a poster that I can't think the right words into my fingers to type---you say it for me.....

 

[VyRoses]

Second, even to the extent that the court must consider intangibles, the judge generally doesn't do so on his own. He evaluated evidence provided by GALs, counselors, etc. AND, when the judge does have to rely on his judgment, the parent who convinces the judge that he/she loves the child and is best able to act in the best interests of the child has the EASIEST time, not the hardest.

Yes, my piont exactly, The parent who 'Convinces the judge', that they 'care' the most.

The parent who 'wins' in the Court Room is Often the most Willful, Determined, and ambitious driven toward the specific goal. Often so selfish and power driven they really don't give a Two-Hoots about the child, But boy are they good at (thats right) winning over the Judge.

Thats right the 'intangible' Sir, is the part of life like love, emotions, nature, matter (atoms) you know Physics. Such Intangible things in court are not significant.

 

[VyRoses]

Alright folks, by the way. Just because I have poor spelling and grammer means nothing on how valid a Point is. Its nothing new to me that I'm a terrible Speller, Just the fact that you guys take such a Low Blow on insulting my grammer shows you're standerds of Integrity, What a surprise.

...I'm still a 'B' Student in University, so I guess spelling and grammer doesn't count for everything.

 

[Just Blue]

Yes, my piont exactly, The parent who 'Convinces the judge', that they 'care' the most.

The parent who 'wins' in the Court Room is Often the most Willful, Determined, and ambitious driven toward the specific goal. Often so selfish and power driven they really don't give a Two-Hoots about the child, But boy are they good at (thats right) winning over the Judge.

Thats right the 'intangible' Sir, is the part of life like love, emotions, nature, matter (atoms) you know Physics. Such Intangible things in court are not significant.

Do you have a mental illness?
Posting Hx folks...

 

[Proserpina]

Alright folks, by the way. Just because I have poor spelling and grammer means nothing on how valid a Point is. Its nothing new to me that I'm a terrible Speller, Just the fact that you guys take such a Low Blow on insulting my grammer shows you're standerds of Integrity, What a surprise.

...I'm still a 'B' Student in University, so I guess spelling and grammer doesn't count for everything.

Seriously - you need to quit.

Wait...you know, I've gone through your posts again.

I think you've had more than one account here.

 

[Just Blue]

...I'm still a 'B' Student in University, so I guess spelling and grammer doesn't count for everything.

Yes. If you are attending Lackwit University, I am sure your spelling, grammar and absence of reality matter not a bit.

 

[Proserpina]

Keep looking.. The finished statement is the next statement below. It is true. Intangible evidance in a court room is completly overlooked.

How many times have you seen the inside of a courtroom?

(Law & Order doesn't count)

 

[VyRoses]

Alright guys peace out. Try to use both sides of your brains okay. Right and Left, you can't just only use the Left (logic) you'll create inbalances in your lives. Yin & Yang, good luck with trying to be individuals.

 

[VyRoses]

Yes. If you are attending Lackwit University, I am sure your spelling, grammar and absence of reality matter not a bit.

Thats right, I'm an Artist so... Do you know anything about art...? didn't think so. Reality, you should try to ask yourself what that is. Maybe you people would become a bit more interesting. But maybe being Sheep is just a bit to comfy humm.

 

[Just Blue]

Alright guys peace out. Try to use both sides of your brains okay. Right and Left, you can't just only use the Left (logic) you'll create inbalances in your lives. Yin & Yang, good luck with trying to be an individual.

As an ambidextrous person I tend to use "both sides". But Thanks for the "advice".

It behooves the OP to use her logic in this matter as the JUDGE will not regard illogic.

 

[Just Blue]

Thats right, I'm an Artist so... Do you know anything about art...? didn't think so. Reality, you should try to ask yourself what that is. Maybe you people would become a bit more interesting. But maybe being Sheep is just a bit to comfy humm.

I know a LOT about Art. I was an artist and both of my children are as well. Being artistic does not = un-educated.

BTW: My yin/yang is just fine...thanks!!