quincy
Senior Member
Definitely hijacked. It might have prevented this hijack, however, if Sparky had provided his state name.I made that comment mainly to show how this thread in the open area was hijacked.
Definitely hijacked. It might have prevented this hijack, however, if Sparky had provided his state name.I made that comment mainly to show how this thread in the open area was hijacked.
I read a Scifi short story years ago in which it was illegal to not carry a gun. Street crime didn't exist.The solution to crime is to liberalize gun ownership for law abiding citizens and allow us to just shoot the bastards that attempt to commit crimes against us.
(I just became a troll. )
That is sort of like Detroit 2018, except for the "no street crime" and "legality" part.I read a Scifi short story years ago in which it was illegal to not carry a gun. Street crime didn't exist.
Oh, we still house them (when charged and convicted), but, we are transferring them to county jails and therefore pretty much not housing any other criminals which is leading to a tremendous increase in criminal behavior.I have no problem paying taxes to provide prisons to house murderers, rapists, terrorists and other violent criminals.
And Detroit is what you get when all of the criminals have guns and law abiding citizens don't.That is sort of like Detroit 2018, except for the "no street crime" and "legality" part.
Well, it's called science fiction for a reason. I think such a law would not result in eliminating all street crime. What it would do is tend to make disputes between people more violent because now they have a gun at the ready when their anger gets the best of them.I read a Scifi short story years ago in which it was illegal to not carry a gun. Street crime didn't exist.
Actually, Kennesaw, GA, requires the head of every household to own a firearm. The actual numbers play out much differently than you expect.Well, it's called science fiction for a reason. I think such a law would not result in eliminating all street crime. What it would do is tend to make disputes between people more violent because now they have a gun at the ready when their anger gets the best of them.
Well, it's called science fiction for a reason. I think such a law would not result in eliminating all street crime. What it would do is tend to make disputes between people more violent because now they have a gun at the ready when their anger gets the best of them.
Unfortunately, in the Detroit area at least, many of these "law-abiding citizens" with guns often wind up in jail as less-than-law-abiding citizens, this when they mistakenly shoot innocent people or let their young children have access to the guns and the kids shoot innocent people (often other kids).And Detroit is what you get when all of the criminals have guns and law abiding citizens don't.
But the law is not enforced and I'd wager quite a few heads of household do not have a weapon in that town. Even if they do have a gun in compliance with the law, the law does not mandate they carry the weapon. My guess is that a lot of them leave the gun at home.Actually, Kennesaw, GA, requires the head of every household to own a firearm. The actual numbers play out much differently than you expect.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/06/us/kennesaw-georgia-gun-ownership/index.html
TD
I don't know how much of an increase in CCW permits resulted from that. I know a lot of people who own guns but not one of them has gone out to get a CCW. They don't feel the need for it. So I'm not convinced there are a huge number of people roaming around out there with concealed weapons. I suspect if there were we would indeed see more rage induced stupidity with those guns, injuring and killing people over trivial things. I myself have seen people do stupid things with guns.That's what anti-gunners said when "shall issue" CCW laws started passing. It didn't happen.