Estate atty not giving me my inheritance!

[Gettingrippedoff]

those are really good questions to ask


Of the TRUSTEE

it is the trustee that has contracted the attorney so it is the trustee that asks such questions.

Is it possible that if I explain my point one more time (for like 100 times total) it might sink in?

Here it is for the last time.

Is it possible for you to admit if an atty does not file paperworks after 8 months when there were no problems or extenuating circumstances - that would be wrong?

That is the only point at this time.

Please either agree or disgree w THAT statement but I ask you to cease and desist w telliing me that the relationship is between my brother and the atty cause I never disagreed with that and stated that was the case about 10 times cept you can't read or comprehend.

 

[justalayman]

If you are going to continue to not be able to read or comprehend where I stated numerous times that I know about the relationship between the trustee and the atty then please just stop posting here. If it hasn't sunken into you after the last 5 times I acknowledge that then it probably never will so please just go away and stop your silliness

Then you should know why your action is against the trustee and not the lawyer the trustee hired but you continue to prove You don’t.

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Of course not.. there is very little simple in the law.

But you are not undertsnding why a company is likely to be the proper party even if one of their employees is who physically caused your damages.

stop hijacking the thread. the conversation was never whether it's appropriate to sue an individual vs the company. You all tried to take it there cause your fragile egos were trying to wiggle out of the corner I painted you into when some of you suggested that it's inappropriate to sue someone you hired to do work and you were trying to weasal your way out of your shattered ego's by actually saying the person who gets sued is the person who hired the person. Just stop w that nonense and your attempt to further mislead and hijack the thread to areas that were never part of the main point.

 

[justalayman]

Is it possible for you to admit if an atty does not file paperworks after 8 months when there were no problems or extenuating circumstances - that would be wrong?

if thst is what the law requires, yes, of course

That is the only point at this time.

I’m presuming you intend on walking through this step by step

Fine, I’ll play along.

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Then you should know why your action is against the trustee and not the lawyer the trustee hired but you continue to prove You don’t.

I am trying to NOT call you an imbecile but you are making it hard given your current statement and the fact that I state 100 times I was always in agreement that the person who had the relationship w my brother was the atty. omg you are daft. I ask you to stop posting here - you are just plain stupid at this point to repeatedly lecture me about the relationship that I already was aware of and understood.

 

[Just Blue]

I am trying to NOT call you an imbecile but you are making it hard given your current statement and the fact that I state 100 times I was always in agreement that the person who had the relationship w my brother was the atty. omg you are daft. I ask you to stop posting here - you are just plain stupid at this point to repeatedly lecture me about the relationship that I already was aware of and understood.

Go pay an attorney.

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

if thst is what the law requires, yes, of course
I’m presuming you intend on walking through this step by step

Fine, I’ll play along.

DING DING DING! IT FINALLY SUNK INTO YOUR THICK SKULL!!! an atty who does not file paperwork for 8 months is to be FAULTED AND HAS DONE A HORRIBLE JOB!!!

There is no other steps. That's it PERIOD!!! tTHAT IS THE POINT THAT NONE OF YOU HAVE BEEN WILLING TO ADMIT! ALL YOU WANTED TO DO WAS COVER FOR YOURSELVES AND YOUR FRAGILE EGOS!

THE ATTY IS WRONG FOR NOT HAVING FILED THE PAPERWORK! Game set match to me!

Goodbye, soyonora, fini, so long!!!!

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Of course not.. there is very little simple in the law.

But you are not undertsnding why a company is likely to be the proper party even if one of their employees is who physically caused your damages.

Who says I don't understand? I undestand but that is not what this thread is about. DON'T HIJACK THE THREAD! GO START YOUR OWN THREAD IF THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT - DON'T DO IT HERE!

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Go pay an attorney.

i AM PAYING ONE! Although I did not hire him- his fees are paid out of the estate accounts. duh??

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Go pay an attorney.

If you have nothing worthwhile to contribute then please stay out of the thread. Looks like another atty unwilling to admit an atty who does not do his job for 8 months is somehow ok and fine and dandy. Talk about unwillingness to do what is right you can't even admit something as just and right as that! Only in the legal profession do the workers have such arrogance to suggest it's ok for them to not do their work and that it's ok. In any other line of work - such poor performance and attitudes are not tolerated or accepted! Attys have their own special brand of non-customer service, non-accountability and irresponsibility that others could not ever get away with.

 

[Just Blue]

Your abusive and rude postings violate the TOS of this site. Said postings have been reported for moderator review.

If you can not conduct yourself in a polite and civil manner the VOLUNTEERS of FreeAdvice will not assist. you and Admin will remove your posting privilege.

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

I am not going to respond to any other posts here unless you can state:

Yes - if an atty did not file papers for 8 months - and there were no extenuating circumsances or problems that arose - that would be wrong.

 

[justalayman]

I am not going to respond to any other posts here unless you can state:

Yes - if an atty did not file papers for 8 months - and there were no extenuating circumsances or problems that arose - that would be wrong.

I already did

 

[Gettingrippedoff]

Your abusive and rude postings violate the TOS of this site. Said postings have been reported for moderator review.

If you can not conduct yourself in a polite and civil manner the VOLUNTEERS of FreeAdvice will not assist. you and Admin will remove your posting privilege.

There has only been harrassement. I told that one dude 10 times that I was not disagreeing with him yet each time he came back and lectured me as though I had never agreed. Why not report him? Or are you a hypocrite? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[justalayman]

There has only been harrassement. I told that one dude 10 times that I was not disagreeing with him yet each time he came back and lectured me as though I had never agreed. Why not report him? Or are you a hypocrite? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you walking through your questions or not?