AI is a real problem when it comes to answering legal questions. The
information that is provided can be
marginally helpful and accurate in a very
broad sense, but it can offer no specific advice and there are enough errors or omissions in what is published as to be misleading.
There is a well-known legal advice site on the internet with attorneys who claim to be answering all of the questions posted - but these attorneys have been relying in recent years on AI. Although the attorneys are required by the site to note when their answers have been AI-generated, consumers apparently are missing this notice posted by the attorneys above their answers or the consumers have no idea what AI-generated means.
This thread is a good example of why you should not trust everything you read on the internet, even from purported attorneys. It is why
specific facts always matter if you are looking for
specific answers for a
specific situation.
It is why everyone who comes to this forum for an
important legal matter should seek out an attorney in their own jurisdiction and sit down with this attorney for a personal meeting and review.
NeonMoon is probably going to continue to believe what he wants to believe - that his brother violated the recording laws in the state of New York - even when the facts he has presented to us here clearly indicate that neither the brother nor Franc did.
I wish NeonMoon and his family much luck in healing their fractured relationships with each other. I don’t see that any thoughts of legal threats or any legal action is available or will help in that pursuit.