FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
You have read the OP's lease?
Bluntly, absent more specifics, I think the landlord is right and the remaining tenant owes the departing one the money. Well technically the landlord owes the departing tenants the money and the remaining tenant owes the landlord the balance of security...
If the...
A toilet boom bom or flap does NOT go bad in a month, or even a quarter.
A landlord could also do a dye test.
Are you honestly suggesting a tenant should be dye testing their toilet?
This is clearly the landlord's problem and he is sticking it to the tenant.
The landlord should have been inspecting the property.
Absent a noxious and or notorious leak the tenant is not responsible unless the lease says otherwise.
What do you mean by "can they"
Like are you concerned about this occurring
OR
Has a seizure occurred and you are wondering if it is right and or how to fight it?
Honestly in either case you badly need an attorney.
He's still the creator and holder of the copyright.
DMCA notices are appropriate and effective to remove content from an inaccessible account. It isn't perjury.
A lot easier and YouTube is far more responsive to DMCA than to restoring access, to which they are virtually non responsive for...
YouTube is the infringer.
Because he no longer has access, they constructively control the account, even though that state of affairs is his own fault.
The idea that 'no one' has control over inaccessible accounts is preposterous. The same is true for the notion that account creators retain...
*I do not control this account"
That's not perjury.
The fact that he created it is immaterial to that fact, nor is how control of the account was lost.
That was much better. I hate small timers and I hate hate HATE copyright owners.
A better reform would be to abolish copyright as saleable property and to limit copyright to 30 years or the life of the creator, whichever is less. And to not allow corporate interestes to create copyright or...
It's called wen a DCMA is issued a notice will go to the forgotten account
No one will answer or appeal.
This is youtube "law" and n ot abiuise of a DCMA at all.
If the idea that abandoned online content can get taken down with a DCMA bothers you, work to repeal one yet another of President...
Though an anecdote, I know people who have removed content from a 'lost' youtube account in this way far more easily than recovering the account.
You do not surrender copyright to google by uploading a video.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.