• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Accused of Racism

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.


--PARIDISE-- said:
You have been hearing it from them. :rolleyes:
What the hell? I've been hearing from you and BelizeBreeze. You're not really suggesting one of you is a lawyer!

I was browsing your posts and apparently you do spend all your time attacking other posters. People like you ruin message boards. I kind of wonder what possesses people like you to make a hobby out of anonymously being a jerk to strangers. You must be happy you have found a home here - I think I'll go off and play with the grown-ups.
 
HomeGuru said:
laurathelawyer said:
I would be interested in hearing from them.

**A: OK. Hello and Goodbye.
You've got some basis for your accusation or do you like to make random attacks like your buddies here?

If you're really a lawyer, I'm wondering how you would argue to your state's ethics committee that the conclusory statement "you have no cause of action," alone, has educational value rather than constituting legal advice. With tens of thousands of posts, I can only imagine how many questionable posts you have. This whole website is walking a fine line, but you don't even seem to be making an attempt not to cross it.
 
--PARIDISE-- said:
Actually, I drive to work every day.
What does your means of transportation have to do with anything?
I guess you could compare yourself though, ...........You have spent two full day's racking up 49 posts. I registered here two years ago. Keep up with your posting count, and you will have surpassed most of us in that amount of time.
The difference is, I have actually provided people with useful information, whereas you seem to spend your time attacking other people. Even in my responses to your attacks I am often providing legal information that might be useful to someone!
Actually, it is people who come on board claiming to be an attorney, yet everyone is correcting you.
Everyone is correcting me? Let's see... someone claimed to correct me regarding custody, when I stated I didn't know anything about family law. (In fact, I ended up here trying to research family law.) A poster named Carl commented on a post re: sealing juvenile records, and although he raised a good point, my statements were correct. Your buddy Belize jumped all over me for stating that I didn't understand how civil damages associated with worked, but then actually agreed that I was right.

I'm not coming in here acting like a know-it-all because I'm an attorney, but everyone here seems to expect me to know everything about the law. Weird.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
There is a world of difference between attending and graduating from Law School and having a bar card. One means only that you attended law school. The other makes you an attorney.

Guess which one you are.
 

dallas702

Senior Member
To OP;

In order for you to get anything other than satisfaction of being told you were not being racist, you would have to show some kind of damages to get anything else. It would waste a lot of your resources (which seem to be taxpayer resources) just to make a point that almost no one cares about.


...and you kids stop fighting. ;)
 

HomeGuru

Senior Member
laurathelawyer said:
You've got some basis for your accusation or do you like to make random attacks like your buddies here?

If you're really a lawyer, I'm wondering how you would argue to your state's ethics committee that the conclusory statement "you have no cause of action," alone, has educational value rather than constituting legal advice. With tens of thousands of posts, I can only imagine how many questionable posts you have. This whole website is walking a fine line, but you don't even seem to be making an attempt not to cross it.

**A: hello and goodbye.
 
BelizeBreeze said:
There is a world of difference between attending and graduating from Law School and having a bar card. One means only that you attended law school. The other makes you an attorney.

Guess which one you are.
Not all attorneys have bar cards. Pointing out your ignorance is kinda fun - like shooting fish in a barrel!

Now you're giving me credit for three years of hard study in law school! That's about 95% of the work involved in becoming an attorney. Don't you think this would give me a certain amount of legal expertise? Tell me, did I take a bar exam and fail it? Or did I fail the background check? Since you know so much about me, why don't you impress me by telling me some other stuff, like my name and where I attended law school.

The only person guessing here is you.
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
laurathelawyer said:
Not all attorneys have bar cards. Pointing out your ignorance is kinda fun - like shooting fish in a barrel!

Now you're giving me credit for three years of hard study in law school! That's about 95% of the work involved in becoming an attorney. Don't you think this would give me a certain amount of legal expertise? Tell me, did I take a bar exam and fail it? Or did I fail the background check? Since you know so much about me, why don't you impress me by telling me some other stuff, like my name and where I attended law school.

The only person guessing here is you.
You must be fresh out of law school if you think that the real world is anything like they teach you in your classes. (Unless, of course, you're one of those "jailhouse laywers" we keep hearing about?)
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Didn't you read her OTHER threads YAG? She says she is works on the Appellate level then she says she is a criminal defense attorney THEN she is saying she doesn't have a bar card.

Geeeez I guess the trap door isn't working this week. but then, HG said all there is to say.
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
BelizeBreeze said:
Didn't you read her OTHER threads YAG? She says she is works on the Appellate level then she says she is a criminal defense attorney THEN she is saying she doesn't have a bar card.

Geeeez I guess the trap door isn't working this week. but then, HG said all there is to say.
You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease. :rolleyes:
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
You Are Guilty said:
You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease. :rolleyes:
Well damn. And I thought Wal-mart was out of the law school business....

me bad :(
 
BelizeBreeze said:
Didn't you read her OTHER threads YAG? She says she is works on the Appellate level then she says she is a criminal defense attorney THEN she is saying she doesn't have a bar card.
It's bizarre that you don't believe that there are attorneys that represent clients in criminal appeals. I explained this in the other thread, and you must be one of the few people in the world who doesn't know this.

I don't blame you for not knowing that not all states issue cards to licensed attorneys, as a lot of attorneys from other states seem to make this assumption as well. Now that I've informed you, you should either take my word for it and shut up, or do your own research to confirm it and shut up.

Geeeez I guess the trap door isn't working this week. but then, HG said all there is to say.
Then why haven't you shut your mouth yet?
 
You Are Guilty said:
You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease. :rolleyes:
Not a member of a bar association =/= not admitted. I've explained this very clearly. Please try to keep up. This is from Wikipedia, for those of you who are still too dense to get it:
In the United States, some state bar associations are operated by their respective state governments which make membership in their state's bar association a requirement to practice before that state's courts; such states are said to have a "mandatory" or "integrated bar". Membership in such associations is synonymous to being admitted to the bar or being licensed to practice law in that state or being admitted to practice before the courts of that state. In some places membership in a bar association is voluntary and in addition to any licensing that may be required by the state or the court system.
And if you've never heard of appellate criminal defense, you are supremely ignorant of the legal system.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
laurathelawyer said:
It's bizarre that you don't believe that there are attorneys that represent clients in criminal appeals. I explained this in the other thread, and you must be one of the few people in the world who doesn't know this.

I don't blame you for not knowing that not all states issue cards to licensed attorneys, as a lot of attorneys from other states seem to make this assumption as well. Now that I've informed you, you should either take my word for it and shut up, or do your own research to confirm it and shut up.

Then why haven't you shut your mouth yet?
Sweetheart, give it up. You cannot represent ANYONE, at the appellate level, the local magistrate or the dog catcher level without being licensed to practice law in the state for which you practice.

Unless you are completely stupid, I suggest you give it up now.

And by the way, IF you were an attorney, you would have put the state from which you SAY you are licensed. So, which prison is it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top