laurathelawyer said:I would be interested in hearing from them.
**A: OK. Hello and Goodbye.
laurathelawyer said:I would be interested in hearing from them.
**A: OK. Hello and Goodbye.
What the hell? I've been hearing from you and BelizeBreeze. You're not really suggesting one of you is a lawyer!--PARIDISE-- said:You have been hearing it from them.
HomeGuru said:You've got some basis for your accusation or do you like to make random attacks like your buddies here?laurathelawyer said:I would be interested in hearing from them.
**A: OK. Hello and Goodbye.
If you're really a lawyer, I'm wondering how you would argue to your state's ethics committee that the conclusory statement "you have no cause of action," alone, has educational value rather than constituting legal advice. With tens of thousands of posts, I can only imagine how many questionable posts you have. This whole website is walking a fine line, but you don't even seem to be making an attempt not to cross it.
What does your means of transportation have to do with anything?--PARIDISE-- said:Actually, I drive to work every day.
The difference is, I have actually provided people with useful information, whereas you seem to spend your time attacking other people. Even in my responses to your attacks I am often providing legal information that might be useful to someone!I guess you could compare yourself though, ...........You have spent two full day's racking up 49 posts. I registered here two years ago. Keep up with your posting count, and you will have surpassed most of us in that amount of time.
Everyone is correcting me? Let's see... someone claimed to correct me regarding custody, when I stated I didn't know anything about family law. (In fact, I ended up here trying to research family law.) A poster named Carl commented on a post re: sealing juvenile records, and although he raised a good point, my statements were correct. Your buddy Belize jumped all over me for stating that I didn't understand how civil damages associated with worked, but then actually agreed that I was right.Actually, it is people who come on board claiming to be an attorney, yet everyone is correcting you.
laurathelawyer said:You've got some basis for your accusation or do you like to make random attacks like your buddies here?
If you're really a lawyer, I'm wondering how you would argue to your state's ethics committee that the conclusory statement "you have no cause of action," alone, has educational value rather than constituting legal advice. With tens of thousands of posts, I can only imagine how many questionable posts you have. This whole website is walking a fine line, but you don't even seem to be making an attempt not to cross it.
Not all attorneys have bar cards. Pointing out your ignorance is kinda fun - like shooting fish in a barrel!BelizeBreeze said:There is a world of difference between attending and graduating from Law School and having a bar card. One means only that you attended law school. The other makes you an attorney.
Guess which one you are.
You must be fresh out of law school if you think that the real world is anything like they teach you in your classes. (Unless, of course, you're one of those "jailhouse laywers" we keep hearing about?)laurathelawyer said:Not all attorneys have bar cards. Pointing out your ignorance is kinda fun - like shooting fish in a barrel!
Now you're giving me credit for three years of hard study in law school! That's about 95% of the work involved in becoming an attorney. Don't you think this would give me a certain amount of legal expertise? Tell me, did I take a bar exam and fail it? Or did I fail the background check? Since you know so much about me, why don't you impress me by telling me some other stuff, like my name and where I attended law school.
The only person guessing here is you.
You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease.BelizeBreeze said:Didn't you read her OTHER threads YAG? She says she is works on the Appellate level then she says she is a criminal defense attorney THEN she is saying she doesn't have a bar card.
Geeeez I guess the trap door isn't working this week. but then, HG said all there is to say.
Well damn. And I thought Wal-mart was out of the law school business....You Are Guilty said:You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease.
It's bizarre that you don't believe that there are attorneys that represent clients in criminal appeals. I explained this in the other thread, and you must be one of the few people in the world who doesn't know this.BelizeBreeze said:Didn't you read her OTHER threads YAG? She says she is works on the Appellate level then she says she is a criminal defense attorney THEN she is saying she doesn't have a bar card.
Then why haven't you shut your mouth yet?Geeeez I guess the trap door isn't working this week. but then, HG said all there is to say.
Not a member of a bar association =/= not admitted. I've explained this very clearly. Please try to keep up. This is from Wikipedia, for those of you who are still too dense to get it:You Are Guilty said:You mean to tell me that after all these years, you've still never heard of a non-admitted appellate criminal defense non-lawyer? Puh-lease.
And if you've never heard of appellate criminal defense, you are supremely ignorant of the legal system.In the United States, some state bar associations are operated by their respective state governments which make membership in their state's bar association a requirement to practice before that state's courts; such states are said to have a "mandatory" or "integrated bar". Membership in such associations is synonymous to being admitted to the bar or being licensed to practice law in that state or being admitted to practice before the courts of that state. In some places membership in a bar association is voluntary and in addition to any licensing that may be required by the state or the court system.
Sweetheart, give it up. You cannot represent ANYONE, at the appellate level, the local magistrate or the dog catcher level without being licensed to practice law in the state for which you practice.laurathelawyer said:It's bizarre that you don't believe that there are attorneys that represent clients in criminal appeals. I explained this in the other thread, and you must be one of the few people in the world who doesn't know this.
I don't blame you for not knowing that not all states issue cards to licensed attorneys, as a lot of attorneys from other states seem to make this assumption as well. Now that I've informed you, you should either take my word for it and shut up, or do your own research to confirm it and shut up.
Then why haven't you shut your mouth yet?