Order is an order
Member
What is the name of your state? Washington.
2005 an Order was handed down Re; paternity/custody/child support.
The court ruled that the male involved was the father without paternity procedure of medical tests. The The female and male had known each other less than one year and had lived at the same address for not more than 4 months. It was learned during the court hearings that the female was until one month before the final court ruling had been ordered to leave the country as a application for refugee status was denied and a visitors visa was 30 days expired at time of court ruling of custody ,thus rendering her an illegal alien whom was aware of her order to leave 30 days prior to the court ruling. She was given additional instructions in the ruling to depart from the country within 7 days time or a arrest warrant would be issued against her.
Mother was given sole custody with the following instructions.
(1) Keep the courts "decided father" informed of the child's whereabouts and well being.
(2) To provide updated photos of the child every four months.
(3) To maintain lines of communication as to afford these two rulings.
To Date: since the date of the ruling. there has been no communication to provide either of the two rulings on her part.
The amounts of child support have being to date kept up, through Child maintenance enforcement monitoring those payments.
Contact information has been maintained to receive and information and or photos however as said, there has been None.
Question is: Has she the mother violated a court order?. The way I see it is, one person is ordered to maintain a sum each month to the other as child support and fails or falls behind he or she accumulates a past due until rears are brought unto date. In contrast, what will and what should happen to the one failing to uphold her portion of the order?. In closing It is believed the mother has maintained a presence in this country illegally and accounts for her un willingness to uphold her portion of same order to avoid penalties and deportation. I feel any revenues given in good faith to honour the order should be made returnable to the payer from date of her deliberate refusal to honour her portion of the order. Think it could happen?
Thank you advance for any suggestions you may have.
2005 an Order was handed down Re; paternity/custody/child support.
The court ruled that the male involved was the father without paternity procedure of medical tests. The The female and male had known each other less than one year and had lived at the same address for not more than 4 months. It was learned during the court hearings that the female was until one month before the final court ruling had been ordered to leave the country as a application for refugee status was denied and a visitors visa was 30 days expired at time of court ruling of custody ,thus rendering her an illegal alien whom was aware of her order to leave 30 days prior to the court ruling. She was given additional instructions in the ruling to depart from the country within 7 days time or a arrest warrant would be issued against her.
Mother was given sole custody with the following instructions.
(1) Keep the courts "decided father" informed of the child's whereabouts and well being.
(2) To provide updated photos of the child every four months.
(3) To maintain lines of communication as to afford these two rulings.
To Date: since the date of the ruling. there has been no communication to provide either of the two rulings on her part.
The amounts of child support have being to date kept up, through Child maintenance enforcement monitoring those payments.
Contact information has been maintained to receive and information and or photos however as said, there has been None.
Question is: Has she the mother violated a court order?. The way I see it is, one person is ordered to maintain a sum each month to the other as child support and fails or falls behind he or she accumulates a past due until rears are brought unto date. In contrast, what will and what should happen to the one failing to uphold her portion of the order?. In closing It is believed the mother has maintained a presence in this country illegally and accounts for her un willingness to uphold her portion of same order to avoid penalties and deportation. I feel any revenues given in good faith to honour the order should be made returnable to the payer from date of her deliberate refusal to honour her portion of the order. Think it could happen?
Thank you advance for any suggestions you may have.
