Moonpie0418
Member
Thank you!!!!!!!! You're right. Very odd crap! Visitation has been 2 hours only 2 times a month since 1999. He has a level 1 founded case of child molestation with my oldest daughter in social services now. Doesn't follow anything the judge or court requires. It's just like the judges don't care or want to believe anything that we say. I have always thought that when you went to court, you could only discuss what the request way. Yesterday, my ex put me through the ringer: how many animals do we have, school days missed, who lives here with us....etc.....everytime my atty objected, she was overrulled by judge. Blew me away! All I want is what's best for mom. Heck, I hope they have 5 kids, fancy cars and house, whatever they want. I certainly do not want or need him. His new wife can live with the hell I did for 8 years. We even had a protective order in place for a long time. He had threatened to kill us. Judge doesn't care. But I am very glad to see that someone may see a little bit of what I do as you do in your post. Thank you.ILOVEMYGSM3 said:is that originally he was only granted 4-8 hrs MONTHLY for visitation, and had to be supervised B/C of a MEDICAL condition, that the judge KNEW of...so apparently either the father has attempted to get some type of information stating he knew how to handle the situation if the child WERE to have a seizure, o rmaybe the case was sent to a DIFFERENT judge, who has not read the ENTIRE case file?...but at the same time, if it was the SAME judge that handled the cc hearing in the BEGINNING, then he also knew the father WOULD REFUSE medication...and if mom had PROOF of the medical condition, and dad REFUSES MEDS, would that not make him IRRESPONSIBLE and unable to care for the child ADEQUATELY? part of being RESPONSIBLE is ensuring your child has the MEDICAL ATTENTION HE/SHE NEEDS...wether you(as an NCP, in dad's case)believe it is right or wrong on how to treat...ALSO, is administering PRESCRIPTION, DAILY REQUIRED MEDICATIONS, not a NEED for the WELLBEING and PHYSICAL HEALTH of the child in question? if the father refuses the child the meds she needs to avoid an EPILEPTIC SEIZURE, then the supervision needs to CONTINUE, not be DIMINISHED...the OP's issue is not wether the child does/does not go to her dad's wedding, but that she will NOT BE ADEQUATELY MONITORED OR TAKEN CARE OF DURING AN EPILEPTIC SEIZURE...and, if ANYONE forces a child, ie dragging, pulling, etc...out of ANYTHING, i'd imagine SOMEONE should call the LAW, and let it be taken BACK TO COURT, to show the father DOES NOT care about the child's wellbeing, if he's willing to DRAG her off somewhere...
other posters-take into context this child is not used to being LEFT ALONE with this man...it's quite possible this is a FEAR of the CHILD'S own?
And yes, my daughter is very afraid to be alone with him this long. With no idea of where she'll be, and not able to contact me if need be.