• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Can Temporary Orders be extended?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

djohnson

Senior Member
stealth2 said:
Actuallym that's not what she said - she said she would NOT say no. ("It wouldn't have been no.")

However, bliss - the judge apparently felt that this was a reasonable timeframe to adjust the child to visitation.

Thanks for pointing that out, I misread that part. :p
 


MinCA

Member
When you learn to do the splits, it's not so comfortable or fun stretching out each day until you do it. But once you're there, it's easy. This little boy is in the stretching phase. He will be fine one he's "there" and used to it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Johnson,

"University of Iowa law professor Margaret Brinig and Stephen Nock, a sociologist at the University of Virginia, found that in two-thirds of divorce cases women file to terminate the marriage. And in another report to be published by Cambridge University Press this year as part of a book by Robert Rowthorn and Antony Dnes, Divorce and Marriage: An Economic Perspective, Brinig and Nock found that men tend to suffer from postdivorce depression much more than their former wives. They also have a much higher suicide rate in such circumstances."

Yet,
"WHO ARE THE PARENTS SEEKING JOINT CUSTODY?

76% are individual parents who did not initiate nor seek divorce."

So you think most "other parents" don't want to be parents?
 

djohnson

Senior Member
MinCA said:
When you learn to do the splits, it's not so comfortable or fun stretching out each day until you do it. But once you're there, it's easy. This little boy is in the stretching phase. He will be fine one he's "there" and used to it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Johnson,

"University of Iowa law professor Margaret Brinig and Stephen Nock, a sociologist at the University of Virginia, found that in two-thirds of divorce cases women file to terminate the marriage. And in another report to be published by Cambridge University Press this year as part of a book by Robert Rowthorn and Antony Dnes, Divorce and Marriage: An Economic Perspective, Brinig and Nock found that men tend to suffer from postdivorce depression much more than their former wives. They also have a much higher suicide rate in such circumstances."

Yet,
"WHO ARE THE PARENTS SEEKING JOINT CUSTODY?

76% are individual parents who did not initiate nor seek divorce."

So you think most "other parents" don't want to be parents?

Oh brother :rolleyes: what a neurotic :rolleyes:


I am trying to make the point that it is never always as you keep stating. There are many circumstances and all are different. You are obviously very unfamiliar with real life and live what life you have in hatred based on what you DH has said. Again grow up, realize it's the child that is important and stop downing bio mom's because of your personal situation. I hope you never become one, because then what will you do down yourself :D your case has nothing to do with any other case here you have posted on yet you seem to state 'always' and down on mom everytime. You just keep living in your little OJ is innocent world.
 
djohnson said:
You want to ease into it and you think a few hours every couple weeks is too much? It seems that is what is happening is easing into it.
I fought for the easing in, the ex filed for sole custody and this is what the judge gave him for a couple months. It's fine, its one day for four hours and one overnight returning at noonish. This is fine and I've offered him more time on the overnight. He doesnt take it. What concerns me is that the TO is up on two weeks and until we go back to court it's the SOP. He's already missed two of his visitations (more important things to do with his s/o) I am concerned about the upcoming longer visits. I'm not trying to keep dad away, in fact, I encourage phone calls, drop ins, whatever. He won't do it. A court can't order you to love or care for or be there for your child. If I err, it is on the side of caution, but I'd rather be careful and wrong then be concerned and right.
 

MinCA

Member
I hope you die a painful death and do the world a favor.

Yes, circumstances are differnt in each case, but you are under the mistaken belief that most NCPs don't want to be parents. Are you basing this on your own child(ren)'s OP not being around?

I'm not living a "life of hatred" based on what my hubby says. I'm on the board of directors of an international children's right organization and have seen cases you wouldn't believe. There are a lot of mothers we help, though in the vast, vast majority of cases it is the father who is being victimized. When parents don't have equal rights, the children do suffer.

You don't get it-you seem to think it's completely okay for a child to have only one parent and to let the other parent pay child support or whatever. Do you want to see this child grow up under the belief that if he didn't "need" his dad, then he's not going to be needed by his children either, that dads are indispensible and that he's worthless as a parent because he didn't "need" his own dad? It's a cycle, and it must be stopped.
 

djohnson

Senior Member
OP: I already stated I misread that part. Sorry again.


MinCA said:
I hope you die a painful death and do the world a favor.

Yes, circumstances are differnt in each case, but you are under the mistaken belief that most NCPs don't want to be parents. Are you basing this on your own child(ren)'s OP not being around?

I'm not living a "life of hatred" based on what my hubby says. I'm on the board of directors of an international children's right organization and have seen cases you wouldn't believe. There are a lot of mothers we help, though in the vast, vast majority of cases it is the father who is being victimized. When parents don't have equal rights, the children do suffer.

You don't get it-you seem to think it's completely okay for a child to have only one parent and to let the other parent pay child support or whatever. Do you want to see this child grow up under the belief that if he didn't "need" his dad, then he's not going to be needed by his children either, that dads are indispensible and that he's worthless as a parent because he didn't "need" his own dad? It's a cycle, and it must be stopped.
I feel sorry for these kids. Who wishes a painful death on someone? You obviously have larger problems than just what is going on with your husband's case. The children's right groups see cases that fall in that category and you are basing advice on something you are obviously biased towards. I never said anything about not needing fathers, just the opposite. I'm just trying to get you to realize that it's not always poor pitiful father and to stop giving your unwanted and poor advice on a legal site where people come for legal answers. There is no always right or always wrong. And I do believe in some cases that the child is better off with out one or both parents no matter the sex. I base decisions on reality and not on a warped sense justice against one. Grow up.
 

MinCA

Member
Who wishes an infertile person the inability to have children? That is far more hurtful than just a "bitchy" comment. I am someone who believes in what is best for the child, and you seem to think that this child should not have one of his parents.

I know there are good mothers and bad fathers, but you don't seem to grasp the concept of bad mothers and good fathers.
 

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
MinCA said:
Who wishes an infertile person the inability to have children?
Where was this posted on this thread?

Now.... please bend over. Using both hands, slowly pull your head out of your a$$. Wash hands. Continue posting. Thank you.
 

djohnson

Senior Member
MinCA said:
Who wishes an infertile person the inability to have children? That is far more hurtful than just a "bitchy" comment. I am someone who believes in what is best for the child, and you seem to think that this child should not have one of his parents.

I know there are good mothers and bad fathers, but you don't seem to grasp the concept of bad mothers and good fathers.

My opinions aren't based on anyone infertility, but on what is best for the child. Again, with your attitude, you would not be best for any child. Stepchild or bio until you learn to control your emotions better. Still you are wishing death, that's a little more than bitchy don't ya think :rolleyes:

I'm not for anyone all the time. If you go back and reread the posts you are the one that keeps saying 'always' this and 'always' that, without giving a mother a fair shake. Grow up.
 

MinCA

Member
"I hope you never become one." Johnson said this after speaking about a biomom.

You need to have your children taken away from you, or any child you love, and have them stuck into a sexual abusive situation, to even begin to see where I'm coming from. Or have your children taken away period and given to someone else-you clearly have no compassion for this NCP when the CP doesn't want the child to have his dad.

It damn well pisses me off when a parent tried to prevent a parent from a relationship with his children for a stupid reason.
 

MinCA

Member
Point is, she said it without knowing who she said it to, without knowing "circumstances," as she likes to say.
 
bliss_in_texas said:
What concerns me is that the TO is up on two weeks and until we go back to court it's the SOP.
Hey, I did see the future. I remember it clearly. I actually predicted SOP in your future on one of your previous post. I believe it was the "He Walked Out on Mediation" post about a month back.
:D
And you said I couln't make it as a fortune teller.... :D Silly you!!!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top