you need an S in your name for Sanctimonious
rmet4nzkx said:
The issue isn't whether or not the children are going to private school or not.
This is the usual standard for the children, OP not only agreed to it but also want's them to go. Furthermore, the monthy payment for 2 children is about the same as the monthly child support he is paying, about $239 per month, he can afford it and is paying it now. Mom has said she will pay all clothing costs for the childen in lieu of 1/2 tuition. Together this is less than he would normally pay in child support for two children for child support.
If you look at OP's other threads you will see that he is very controlling, he has even gotten an order disallowing 3rd party visits during parenting time and wanted to enforce it retroactively
When that didn't work, he went to the local narc and reported his wife and her friend as having drugs in the house, around the children and that the friend was a dealer. Apparently the narc took his report and did nothing or found nothing. While he sits in the marital home, he complains that she spends nearly $700 on rent for her and the children and that she should go home and live with her father.
OP is controling and manipulative, he is upset that he got dumped, I wonder why. He also threatens others including us on this forum, even going to the point of making totally false claims about me.
"Quote:
Originally Posted by bd420
You can cram the rest jackass, and your name is also common in the 313 crackhouses as well, so I gess you do that too, right? Do us all a favor and save it, you have an axe to grind with me, others here don't, just leave the thread and spew your ignorant and unfounded venom somewhere else."
He claims his wife has mental illness while exhibiting many aspects of mental illness himself. What is this thing with numbers anyway, a code of some sort 420 and 313?
Let him simmer in his own juices and let some judge teach him what a court can do.
Assuming the x and n don't stand for xtreme nonsense, you do have 1 aspect correct, in that this is about the children, as always.
They are used to this school, and to clarify, the 7 yr old is in 2nd grade, this is her 3rd yr in this system.
If you had the mental acumen to understand 1/10th of any of my other threads, you would note that I obviously am NOT 'very contorlling', rotflmao, that's an incredibly hypocritcal thing to say given my current status of uncontrolled debt.
The 'tco' that you refer, you are erroneous about it saying that it is "disallowing 3rd party visits during parenting time and wanted to enforce it retroactively", I won't flatter you with an emoticon. What it does say is that there are to be no romantic interests over during parenting time, in an attempt to keep my children from crying over this topic at the family counselor visits that I'm taking them to, bc I'm so 'controlling', ha.
"When that didn't work", wrong again motormouth, it has worked, drugboy is only over on her time.
I "went to the local narc", nice of you to belittle any of our hard working law enforcement agencies across the nation, why am I not surprised? She has many 'friends' that are dealers, but just one boyfriend that is a dealer, keep up with me metlife.
The Deputy took my report, told the appropriate DEA in our area, and forwarded my complaint number to BAYANET, along with informing the Sargeant, I guess he had nothing better do to, right?
BAYANET told me that Jason Michael Green, age 28, is NOT what they consider a major 'player' at this time, which may have been an obvious lie, as any covert operation isn't going to necessarily tell someone who could easily be a fr of the dealer calling and acting the part of a concerned parent such as myself up, and tell them squat, if they are telling the truth, I'm relieved he's small potatoes at least. But, I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, am I?
I pay nearly 2k in minimum marital debt, so I don't understand your 'complain' comment, if she's too broke that she can go to the smoke shop BUT not save something for tuition, then I'll agree to disagree, moving to her moms or dads is an easy, less expensive option for her that she's done many times in her life, most recently 7 yrs ago, I'm shir you have a point in there somewhere, although it's quite diluted at best.
"OP is controling and manipulative, he is upset that he got dumped, I wonder why", I wonder too, since I've personally never been happier about how MY life is going, I've never been unhappier about how the children's life is going either, starting to become as wrong as my wife has been recently, quite an amazing feat.
If you see anything I've written as a threat, you really need to join the real world bro, and you haven't exactly been less than inflammatory in your own right, I don't think the word angelic comes do mind when describing your diatribes.
You wouldn't last a day in the 313, that's all I'll say about numbers mr. met.
"let some judge teach him what a court can do", I have contended all along that I hope this DOES make it to court, and that my ex is the one that doesn't want it to go to court, gee, I wonder why, lol. If we do get to court, we are slated to have the same judge that ruled on her OUIL and driving the wrong way with drugs in her car that were not found, I wonder what the 'court could do' with that, eh met-wrong?
Like I said, if you don't remember things about this situation all to well, or you have your own agenda against me, then just remove yourself from the thread, you are coming off as something most people dislike: A sanctimonious, know-it-all, that slants things to make themselves appear better than others.
