mediator did not want to hear anything

[casa]

Casa, read the whole post:

"Originally Posted by corset
What is the name of your state?Pa
hi there:
i will try not to ramble on,, here is the situation, three years ago my husband was deployed to the middle east he is in the army reserves, during his stay deployement i his wife sent via his military email adult porno pictures. there was never a problem until NOW, my husband used to work for a state university in Pa, back in november a fellow employee made a complaint stating that my husband was visting adult and child porno sites. my husband and his employer had a predis hearing and during this hearing they stated that he visited these sites however when he asked about these sites the sites could no longer be brought up onto the computer, my husband was fired,, also he asked about the pictures that they said was on the harddrive however again they said the pictures could not be viewed,, interesting, anyway the university sent the harddrive to the state police,, the state police and others keep saying that there are pics of children on this harddrive however we have the pics in question and they are far from being children or animals involved... the military came to my home and talked with both myself and my husband asking about these pics,,, they also searched my home and they found nothing,,,,, no porno,,, now the military wants to start separation process against my husband.. when we look at the paperwork that was given to my husband the changes are not consistant...
my concerns are many,, if these charges are soo bad why havent the state police come into my home and do a search...
there are only six emails that were sent to my husband using is military email, and he sent those pics back to his private emails,,,
they are stating that there are many, however when we asked what emails they wont tell us,, my husband was advise to call JAG,

ohh by the way my husband has over 20 years of service
thanks for any advise

ann "

bononos~ Read the bolded sentence.

During her husband's deployment she sent him pictures. However, he kept the pictures on his hard drive when he was employed for a school in PA. At some point he must have looked at them while at work, a co-worker was offended and complained. They investigated and even though there were no 'sites' that were accessable, the pictures were on his hard drive and he was terminated.

This is not hard to understand at all. A friend recently received an e-mail which had semi-clad firemen posing for a calendar. She works for a University~ a co-worker complained and she went through something similar. She was not fired, but she was written up for viewing 'adult' material while at work. It happens.

 

[casa]

Us too. Didn't stop the ex from trying to use the porn against me during the divorce... or during this current proceeding for that matter.

LOL, luckily my X would not have used any of this against me...as it would have opened the whole can of worms up re; his, errr, problems.

 

[corset]

mediator did not want to heay anything

first and foremost bonono
this emails in question was sent before husband came home
the military had access to all incoming and out going emails, they chose not to do anything

cid came into the house and found nothing, only my corsets and such which is not against any laws and some sexual toys which again is not against any laws, so what is your problem with my posts
there is no physical or neglect going on in the house
the kids are well taken care of

 

[bononos]

Quote:
Originally Posted by corset
hi armycop
here are the allegations and the findings from the preliminary report
first the investigations findings:
here is the reason why they are starting this proceedure
you did at or the near the state university interstate commerce, including through the use of the ako on various and divers occassions from between and the dates are given knowingly posses images of child pronography to wit:
visual depicitions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct

the information in this report is based upon an allegation or preliminary investigation and may be changed prior to the completion of the investigation
Exchange and distribution of child pornograhic images and movies exhibiting bestiality (sexual relations between humans and animals)

disclosed child porno images was identified on the computer harddrive. as the examination was not complete the extent of the images was unknown

and finally the university is stating that i used my husband ako account to view porn images,,, (first off i dont know my husband military username and or password,, )

this investigation is still pending completion of the forensic examination and the examination of husband ako account history..

the date of this investigation was done on march 15, 2005 and now its june 9,05,,,

now here are the charges
computer fraud, pornography, bestiality

this is the reasons why they are starting separation proceeding against my husband


ok,,first and foremost if the army looked into husband ako account they would have seen that no child or adult porno was transmitted after his return to the states which was on or about 2/04. they are stating that upon his return to the states he transmitted child and adult porn,

we also feel that our phone is being tapped and also bank and credit card statements looked at

i have stated that we have the images..

thanks


How ya like them apples Casa!
I'm sure the military had no basis for this, huh.
They made it all up.
It's a conspiracy I tell ya!

bestiality???????? Now I'm getting scared!

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Quote:
Originally Posted by corset
hi armycop
here are the allegations and the findings from the preliminary report
first the investigations findings:
here is the reason why they are starting this proceedure
you did at or the near the state university interstate commerce, including through the use of the ako on various and divers occassions from between and the dates are given knowingly posses images of child pronography to wit:
visual depicitions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct

the information in this report is based upon an allegation or preliminary investigation and may be changed prior to the completion of the investigation
Exchange and distribution of child pornograhic images and movies exhibiting bestiality (sexual relations between humans and animals)

disclosed child porno images was identified on the computer harddrive. as the examination was not complete the extent of the images was unknown

and finally the university is stating that i used my husband ako account to view porn images,,, (first off i dont know my husband military username and or password,, )

this investigation is still pending completion of the forensic examination and the examination of husband ako account history..

the date of this investigation was done on march 15, 2005 and now its june 9,05,,,

now here are the charges
computer fraud, pornography, bestiality

this is the reasons why they are starting separation proceeding against my husband


ok,,first and foremost if the army looked into husband ako account they would have seen that no child or adult porno was transmitted after his return to the states which was on or about 2/04. they are stating that upon his return to the states he transmitted child and adult porn,

we also feel that our phone is being tapped and also bank and credit card statements looked at

i have stated that we have the images..

thanks


How ya like them apples Casa!
I'm sure the military had no basis for this, huh.
They made it all up.
It's a conspiracy I tell ya!

bestiality???????? Now I'm getting scared!

My guess would be that the mediator knows about the porn thus no further evidence and direct to the judge. Nothing is being said for the sake of the child and dad doesn't want to stir things up.

Cut to the courtroom:

?: Mr. PW Can you recite your employment history from the most recent going backwards?

Mr. PW: Do you mean where I have worked?

?: Where you have worked, income reason for leaving?

Mr. PW: Well, uh........

?: Please speak up Mr. PW the court reporter can't hear you...............

 

[bononos]

ok,,first and foremost if the army looked into husband ako account they would have seen that no child or adult porno was transmitted after his return to the states which was on or about 2/04.

Anybody reading this how I am.
Isn't this an admission that it was in fact transmitted, the OP and hubby are just arguing WHEN it was transmitted.
And yes, the word child is placed in there by OP.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

ok,,first and foremost if the army looked into husband ako account they would have seen that no child or adult porno was transmitted after his return to the states which was on or about 2/04.

Anybody reading this how I am.
Isn't this an admission that it was in fact transmitted, the OP and hubby are just arguing WHEN it was transmitted.
And yes, the word child is placed in there by OP.

Of course I am but I'm afraid the legal theory would be lost on OP.

 

[bononos]

MOOOOOOO...
WOOF...WOOF...
BAAAAAAAA.....

Any of these sounds turn you on??????

I think it's time to bow out of this one.

 

[corset]

this is directed to the last post
again there was no child porno sent via any emails and like i have repeatedly stated i have the pics in questions in a safe place.
and as for work history
well lets see
how does people in jail get jobs
and if my husband was such a f,,king nut job why the hell would the military award him for saving millions of dollars
and to bonono comment on the lost post

a captain also sent my husband a porno picture and did anything happened to him, and the answer is hell NOOO
LETS ALL GO INTO PRIVATE EMAILS AND UNDER BEDS TO SEE WHAT PEOPLE HAVE

 

[corset]

Mediator did not want to hear anything

to bonono
when was the last time you had sex,, how dare you

 

[bononos]

With animals?
Never

 

[CJane]

LETS ALL GO INTO PRIVATE EMAILS

The problem is, if you're accessing that 'private' email via a computer at work, or using a connection provided by your work in some other manner (ie many universities offer free internet to their employees so that they can log into the intranet at the university from home) then it's NOT private. I'm even willing to be that hubby knew that those emails would not be considered private because they're routed through a server at his place of employment. MOST companies make you aware that all internet access may be monitored for content, and that emails sent/received using the company server are subject to certain rules/restrictions.

Hubby - intentionally or not - violated the rules of his jobs by receiving those emails and maintaining any of the actual material on his hard drive. Whether others have been punished in a like manner is irrelevant.

 

[corset]

to all who have condemn myself and hubby for looking at porn
there is an article on cnn titled Web Site: U.S troops traded iraq photos for porn access,, very interesting it looks like the 30,000 plus military personel will be busted for having access to this site

 

[dallas702]

Well, obviously the existance of (true) child porn on dad's computer would be a concern of the court, although I don't see any conviction regarding this.

Bestilialty...how does sex with "beasts" become BESTiality? OK, so it's not my cup of tea, but since when did that become "illegal". All of this stuff is constantly available all over the net. I get some of this junk in emails, and much of it is disguised as other information. Deleting it is not always a guarantee of actually stopping it from getting on your harddrive.

I do think "rmet" may have a point about dad's reluctance to fight mom too hard...for fear of having the porn charges become very public knowledge. But, he stil has the ability (legally, physically, and morally) to go get his son.

All in all, if dad won't become aggressive and take serious action it won't matter what the reason or what mom's plea is. Like I said before, if he isn't going to go get the boy and fight for him he might as well just let him go and live with the regrets and guilt...or do the best he can as an NCP.

BTW: was the reason that dear mom was considered "unfit" way back at the beginning ever addressed, and/or why she is now able to just scoop the boy up and steal him away against the CO?

 

[CJane]

Beastilialty? OK, so it's not my cup of tea, but since when did that become "illegal".

Are you kidding me?

And while a conviction would be really bad, with some judges just mentioning that porn might possibly be inside the house somewhere even if you never in a million years think the kid might see it, is enough to convince a judge that custody should change.