rmet,
I did not "announce" it when it happened, because I did not get online that day. Your calling me a liar, that is slander.
I did NOT say I spoke only to the clerk. I spoke to the clerk AFTER I spoke to that attorney. With the judge on my son's side, it doesn't matter who says what, only the judge's decision is what counts. Since the judge saw fit to drop the charges against my son, he DOES NOT have to register as a sex offender. It does not matter what the lawyer told me.
I came here to ask a legal question, which I did. That question was answered, directly and to the point, by Carl.
Sorry that I got so wrapped up in the narrow-minded opinions of so many, especially you. The point I have been trying to make is that mitigating circumstances are enough for a decision other than what is "by the book."
This world is not black and white... is it mostly various shades of grey.
If my son had told the judge, "Yes, I did it. Yes, I went after a minor," then I would agree that he should be sentenced "by the book". But that was not the case here.
The judge believes my son is the innocent victim here, not the girl. Why can't you just show some intelligence and let it go?
Maybe it's because you can't stand not having the last word, and that just shows your insecurities. No matter what you say, and to whom, or in which post, you are already notorious for your eagerness to condemn.
"Those who attempt to belittle the skills of others are simply jealous."
I will no longer write TO you in answer to anything you say, because I have better things to do with my life than listen to your ravings. You are a sad, insecure, belittling, slandering and probably very lonely woman.
I hope that someday you will find peace within yourself.