No argument there.The code elsewhere defines a junked vehicle as one which is not registered and is partially dismantled or can not be self-propelled or moved in a manner in which it was intended to move. Lacking an engine or wheels would fit that category.
However, it's the fact that he really has "junk" vehicles that's getting him in trouble with his locals. He can't have it both ways. Once it's either drivable OR he puts a plate on it, it's going to need insurance. As I said, I can guarantee that the plates will be revoked and subject to confiscation and other penalties if he has it registered and fails to maintain insurance.
But that brings us to the question of how one "unregisters" a vehicle in NC...There's nothing he can do that makes it not a vehicle subject to the law if he still has it registered.
I agree - but if the vehicle is chopped in to pieces and spread out, then those pieces are not a vehicle.I suspect the odds are stacked against him if they are pursuing the vehicles as junk/nuisance whatever. If it is recognizable as once being a car, it likely fits into the the statute.
So? Did they fine you or tell you to move them or wag their fingers at you and say "neener neener"?What is the name of your state?NC
We keep two old cars parked in front of our house, in addition to the car we use for transportation. I want to keep the cars for several reasons that are important to me. The neighbor called the city code office to report a non-existent problem (she occasionally takes her moods out on us, this has been going on for over a decade), and when the code officers came, out, they discovered we lack "tags" for the defunct cars.
It's a financial decision to pay fines (if applicable) or pay for insurance and tags. Talk to your insurance agent and find out what the least expensive insurance available is. Since you're not driving them, I suspect you don't need collision or comprehensive. You should find out what the absolute minimum is to get tags.We are willing to purchase tags if need be, but then insurance would be required, which is ridiculous for cars that will never move again.
Interesting...If a "sculpture" has a VIN number, it is a junk car. Let's be real.
Yes, he could, but that doesn't mean it's allowable per the city's codeMr.Toad could stack one car atop the other, perhaps with something sticking out between the cars (like a road sign or guard rail) and title his sculpture “Car Sandwich.” Or he could stand his vehicles on end and bury an end partially in the ground, like the “Cadillac Ranch” car sculpture in Amarillo, Texas.
True. But calling the vehicles “art” could make for an interesting court case.Yes, he could, but that doesn't mean it's allowable per the city's code
True, but those pieces may violate a different ordinance.if the vehicle is chopped in to pieces and spread out, then those pieces are not a vehicle.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fuqCxsUuFuo/ULVTL4zQcGI/AAAAAAAABdw/Y4FEsjN7kSM/s1600/006.JPGOr he could stand his vehicles on end and bury an end partially in the ground, like the “Cadillac Ranch” car sculpture in Amarillo, Texas.
Mr.Toad would have to invest in at least one more car to adequately create a partial Carhenge. I think he may have enough on his hands with just the two.True, but those pieces may violate a different ordinance.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fuqCxsUuFuo/ULVTL4zQcGI/AAAAAAAABdw/Y4FEsjN7kSM/s1600/006.JPG
Or Carhenge in Nebraska.
http://www.infoniac.com/uimg/carhenge-monument-nebraska.jpg
Can you imagine the curiosity future peoples will feel when they excavate "Carhenge" in 1 or 2 thousand years?