I posted this as a general question, as stated in my original post.
I am not increasing ANYTHING 'now'. I am aware of what my ex and I agreed to when we agreed to 50/50 custody, and since the divorce was final, we haven't lived 'in the same community'.
Your opinion of who my move benefited is irrelevant. The move benefitted myself, my children, my boyfriend, and my employer. I wasn't aware I was pregnant when I moved in, so my unborn child was irrelevant to the decision. It also has not harmed my ex/our visitation schedule.
My question pertains to FUTURE moves. In this world, there's no assurance that people will live in the same house forever. My fiance and I hope to build a home in the next year or so. It will be in this county/general area but will of course require a change of address. I'm wondering if IN THE FUTURE such things are deemed important to the courts.
....
Ok, it says "Petitioner (the ex) shall have sole legal custody of minor children subject to the following provisions." Then it goes on to outline a standard joint legal agreement. For example, it states that he has to consult with me on every decision regarding education and medical care. Intentionally left out was any reference to religion, as that was a contentious issue during the divorce and I don't have any issues with him raising the kids in his newly chosen religion.
It further states that we each have 'custody periods' (NOT visitation) with me having them from 8pm on Sunday to 8am Wednesday, him having them from 8am Wednesday until 8am Friday, and then alternating weekends. I have them every Christmas, on their birthdays, Mother's Day, my birthday, and every Halloween. He has them every New Years and Easter, and Father's Day, and the other Holidays alternate on an even/odd year schedule.
I am not suggesting that ANY of that change, other than the phrasing 'sole legal custody' since the plan is actually a joint plan.
<>
Well, I'm clear about MY motives, and I'm pretty sure I know what his are. I also tend to be more articulate than he is, and may communicate my motives to the court better. But, this is a conservative area and I worry that his recent marriage, newfound religious dedication, appearance of wealth, etc will sway the judge unfairly...
As part of his insistence that the move negatively impacts the kids, he's saying that it makes it 'impossible for the kids to engage in community activities in his area'. The only activities they've ever been involved in are soccer in the fall and a church group on Wednesday nights.
My move obviously won't affect church since Wed is his night. But, he called me last week and said that he's signing the girls up for brownies, and wanted my approval though he has no idea when they meet. I told him to find out and we'd discuss it (in case it falls on 'my' time). There are several reasons that I don't think brownies at this point is really necessary, but I'm concerned that if I deny the involvement for 'my' reasons, he'll make it about the distance. How does one combat that?