• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

General questions for pursuing physical custody.

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
Well, that's just a few of us. (I've missed people - sorry if I did that)
Ya missed me. 'Cause I haven't posted to this thread yet!Heck - I didn't read all of the op as it went on and on and on.

It's not that unusual for a 12/13 yo to baby sit an infant/toddler. I could see OP's concern if he'd found a six/seven yo watching his kid.

And at the end of the day, OP? If you don't like the input you're receiving here? Go pay a lawyer!
 


Proserpina

Senior Member
She paid for help, didn't help. What is interesting though is that you believe mom spending thousands of dollars to prevent weekly overnights is better parenting than dad insisting on being a consistent part of his daughters life.

Which faults am I not admitting to? Not standing idle as an every other weekend dad while someone else raises our kid? Insisting on being a consistent part of my daughters life? Spoiling her rotten? Moving into the best school district in the city? Not allowing my parental influence to be marginalized just because mom says so? Insisting that I have as much input in raising our child as I had in creating our child?

You people have a very strange perspective on things.

I suppose it might be a very strange perspective to you.

:cool:
 
Ya missed me. 'Cause I haven't posted to this thread yet!Heck - I didn't read all of the op as it went on and on and on.

It's not that unusual for a 12/13 yo to baby sit an infant/toddler. I could see OP's concern if he'd found a six/seven yo watching his kid.

And at the end of the day, OP? If you don't like the input you're receiving here? Go pay a lawyer!
yea yea I've heard that before ... not done being trolled just yet
 
When i get a little more if not exactly what I'm looking for at the next court hearing will some of you "volunteers" apologize?
 
Last edited:
We'll probably be more worried about the welfare of the child.

You? We don't care about you.
Mom? Ditto.

Child? Poor kid.
You are a phony ... No person concerned with the welfare of a child would suggest anything but both parents being actively involved in said child's life. After all thats what the subject matter experts claim as best practice ....
 

Proserpina

Senior Member
You are a phony ... No person concerned with the welfare of a child would suggest anything but both parents being actively involved in said child's life. After all thats what the subject matter experts claim as best practice ....

You'd be fine with Charles Manson being actively involved in the lives of his children?

Really?

Sometimes it's better that the child isn't exposed to one of his parents.

I'll accept your apology in advance.
 

TheGeekess

Keeper of the Kraken
You'd be fine with Charles Manson being actively involved in the lives of his children?

Really?

Sometimes it's better that the child isn't exposed to one of his parents.

I'll accept your apology in advance.
Some to the point to where the State will step in and remove parental rights of just one of the parents, making them DNA donors. No legal rights, no more than the guy walking his dog in a neighborhood across town. :cool:
 

CJane

Senior Member
I'd just like to point out that I didn't say you shouldn't have summer visits. What I SAID is that the fact that Grandma left a teenager in charge of a 2 year old while she did some shopping, is not a good enough reason to be awarded half the summer.
 
Last edited:

LdiJ

Senior Member
Dad, People are not giving you are hard time because they don't believe that fathers should be major or even equal players in their children's lives. They are giving you are hard time because of some of the rationales that you are giving to justify what you want...and the arrogance you are displaying.

I don't think that you realize it, but you are presenting yourself very poorly here. Some examples:

You should never enter mom's home without a specific invitation to do so. Otherwise you are being rude and arrogant. Doing it under the guise of "getting the child ready" doesn't make it any less rude or arrogant.

Using the rationale that you should have every other week in the summer time because one time a 13 year old was watching your child is just bizarre...seriously, it really is. Asking for every other week in the summer time because you believe that is in the best interest of your child is another story, and is actually fairly normal.

Insisting that a major holiday is YOUR holiday just because it happens to be one of your days off...while you are on a temporary schedule that happens to give you your days off, shows a fundamental lack of understanding about how things work.

Saying that you should have primary custody because that will foster a better relationship between you and mom is again bizarre...it seriously is. It smacks of the belief that you should be "in charge" so that you can force mom to bow to your superior will.

So far what the judge has given you is fairly ordinary. Do not get a swelled head because you are getting what is fairly ordinary.

I just went back and reviewed your previous thread...and the same sort of pervasive arrogance came across there as well. You are not done with court yet...you have only barely started. Be darned careful because that is not going to be an asset for you.
 
Last edited:

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
You are a phony ... No person concerned with the welfare of a child would suggest anything but both parents being actively involved in said child's life. After all thats what the subject matter experts claim as best practice ....
Boy are you wrong about that. I have suggested that one parent have NOTHING to do with their child. And it was the best for the child and the child's welfare. I have done that a few times in recommendations.
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
I just went through your other thread and NO ONE was being mean to you. You however were being rude to everyone. You were told to go to court and get enforceable orders. YOU were TOLD that the courts would give you a schedule. You were told that the courts are NOT pro mom. You argued everything.

Though we were right. You owe us all an apology.
 
You'd be fine with Charles Manson being actively involved in the lives of his children?

Really?

Sometimes it's better that the child isn't exposed to one of his parents.

I'll accept your apology in advance.
Charles Manson analogies are really uncalled for ... I'm on the good side of the law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top