Giving up parental rights

[rmet4nzkx]

Not to argue with either of you, or jump into your argument, but I just assumed that rmet was ADDING another species, not saying that it doesn't happen with humans.

Of course that is what I said and I never said nextwife was wrong and she knows that, fair is a troll and is just stirring up trouble since I made the statement.

 

[moburkes]

Of course that is what I said and I never said nextwife was wrong and she knows that, fair is a troll and is just stirring up trouble since I made the statement.

Okay.

 

[fairisfair]

Of course that is what I said and I never said nextwife was wrong and she knows that, fair is a troll and is just stirring up trouble since I made the statement.

Actually fair is just sick and tired, along with numerous others on this site, of you acting like you know everything about everything, constantly belittling and correcting other posters, I am not the only one who has decided lately to give you a taste of your own non FDA approved medicine. And if nextwife didn't feel the same, then why did she bother to come back and post the information on superfecundation????

 

[nextwife]

Yes that is also true, it happens all the time with dogs

"That is also true" is a statement of acknowledgement, not one of denial.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10641935&dopt=Abstract


A case of superfecundation and dual paternity in a twin pregnancy is presented. Placental abruption developed at week 33 of gestation and the two boys had to be saved by emergency cesarean section. As they shared one placenta, had almost identical weight and had the same sex, they were assumed to be monozygotic. However, a subsequent paternity suit led to the conclusion, based on DNA-analysis, that the twin brothers had been fathered by two different men. Obstetrical implications are discussed."

The implications of such a scenario are rather interesting in respects to CS and custody. Twins could each have different visitation schedules (one supervised, one shared custody), different levels of support, and different judges making determinations about their cases (this might occur if each father proactively and independently files for paternity establishment). Also, I would presume that in ALL fraternal twin births, BOTH twins would need to be DNA tested for paternity establishment. If only ONE twin is positive for the father testing, for example, would mom need to reimburse dad for the cost of the second test? Can just ONE of the fathers be made responsible for the birthing costs, if no paternity has been established for twin 2, for example?

If dad of twin 1 works days and can provide daytime care for his child, would he then get daytime custody of one twin, while the other goes to daycare? Etc.

Thre could also be DNA questions in the case if one of the parents being a f "Chimera"

 

[nextwife]

Thre could also be DNA questions in the case if one of the parents being a f "Chimera"

I know, I posted a "what if" thread quite a while back about Chimeras. That is even more complicated, as a chimera can have different DNA profiles in different organs. In the case of a chimera, there are TWO dna profiles. If both are discovered, WHO is made responsible to pay support? And who would share custody - would the child have three parents?

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Actually fair is just sick and tired, along with numerous others on this site, of you acting like you know everything about everything, constantly belittling and correcting other posters, I am not the only one who has decided lately to give you a taste of your own non FDA approved medicine. And if nextwife didn't feel the same, then why did she bother to come back and post the information on superfecundation????

Halls was wrong in her statement and I am not the only one to challenge her, you are the only one what needs to make up things in order to make a point, that makes you a liar. Even nextwife has pointed out that you were wrong in your accusation.
Go find a bridge and take a nap like a good little troll.

 

[fairisfair]

Halls was wrong in her statement and I am not the only one to challenge her, you are the only one what needs to make up things in order to make a point, that makes you a liar. Even nextwife has pointed out that you were wrong in your accusation.
Go find a bridge and take a nap like a good little troll.

you have yet to explain the rolly eyes. There are are alot of people who are intimidated by you because they think that you have some kind of "in" with the administrator, and are impressed by your number of posts, I am not one of them. and I NEVER lie. the manner in which you stated your "agreement" was indicative of sarcasm, you can twist it however you want.

 

[Rushia]

When wannabe Doctor's didn't have the soap operas on. But I think I like that redheaded Rushia babe. She is funny.

Thanks, but unfortunetly due to being outside with the kids my hair has bleached out to blonde. Sigh, time to break out the dye.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

I know, I posted a "what if" thread quite a while back about Chimeras. That is even more complicated, as a chimera can have different DNA profiles in different organs. In the case of a chimera, there are TWO dna profiles. If both are discovered, WHO is made responsible to pay support? And who would share custody - would the child have three parents?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics) Actually the problem has arose where the birthmother's DNA didn't match and the State took custody of her child thinking it was stolen or something to that effect. One of the children in our neighborhood is a chimera and he has a distinct line down his chest with two different pigmentations, it is very interesting and lots of implications.

 

[stealth2]

Didn't y'all have enough of the bickering in Jr High?

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Didn't y'all have enough of the bickering in Jr High?

We didn't bicker in Jr High, although we were careful not to wear black and red on Thursday because that meant you were a ..... well you know easy.

 

[Halls]

fairisfair, Didn't you know that rmet is the Police around here? She has no life cause she finds it her duty to go around making sure everyoner gives advice to her liking and if they don't she will make sure they hear it from her???

 

[rmet4nzkx]

fairisfair, Didn't you know that rmet is the Police around here? She has no life cause she finds it her duty to go around making sure everyoner gives advice to her liking and if they don't she will make sure they hear it from her???

You gave out wrong information, I was not the only one to point it out. You should admit it and move on. It does a great disservice to posters who come here for advice and to receive wrong advice, now that kid will go off thinking that there is no possibility that he is the father of that child or what to do to establish his parental rights if and or when a child is born. Sure there are times when everyone doesn't agree here or when trolls disrupt the forums, but when you are wrong, you need to admit it or better yet, don't give out advice that is absolute in nature without qualification. Just because some posters feel the need to make up their advice just so they can post doesn't make it right either. Research if you don't know or wait for someone else to answer.

 

[Halls]

rmet, I don't need to admit anything to you or anyone. In fact NO one here needs you or anyone else policing them. I think you need to admit you do that and back off. You have no idea how rediculous you look when you are chasing people around the board telling them their wrong and need to admit it. How petty. Why don't you just spend your time answering posts and leave the moderator job to the admins around here! They are the ones in charge and if they have an issue with something someone posts I'm sure they can handle it.