I have family members in the apparel business, and they worked with models, set up runway shows, used fit models for sizing etc. No way, no how, under no circumstances would I ever consider allowing my child to have anything whatsoever with that end of the industry. Horribly unreasonable body image is encouraged, anorexia rampant, terrible schedules and a disqusting over emphasis on appearance, rather than substance and intellect.
Personally, I would be livid if anyone tried to introduce my child into that lifestyle.
Far better to find intellectually enriching pursuits.
If a child's photo appears because they actually ACHEIVED something of note, that is different than their image appearing in an underwear or uniform ad. And, BTW, my child was offered that opportunity and we turned it down flat.[/QUOTE]
Dad says his issue is "who knows who all is looking at those photos". As has been stated, a pedophile could "use" a picture of daughter posing all sweaty, hair falling down, clutching her soccer ball, JUST as easily as in a modeling shoot photo. Pedophiles can coach soccer teams OR photograph child models.
A good friend of mine has recently started his kids in acting camps, trying to get them movie roles (I suspect it is mainly his wife's doing) It's not what I want for my kids (and they've asked me to consider it for my oldest) but it's not my place to insinuate that they are bad parents for doing so.
And "achieving something of note" is in the eye of the beholder. There are people who wouldn't consider academic acheivements noteworthy, and others who wouldn't consider sporting achievements noteworthy.
I totally understand Dad being upset. But it sounds as though LEGALLY Mom can do what she did. And it doesnt' make her a bad person or a bad parent.