rmet4nzkx said:
Correct YOUR post is worthless.
Don't tell my you forgot to take your 'anti-stupid' pills again!!!
I asked the questions knowing full well what the response would be otherwise they wouldn't be comming here looking for other possibilities and why I initially asked the questions I did.
What the hell are you talking about???
Your post ("Unfortunately OP's husband was self employed and chose not to get worker's compensaiton insurance nor any other type of insurance. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BASICS The California workers' compensation system"), doesn't ask ANY "questions" at all.
And since workers comp insurance doesn't apply to self-employed.... your post is worthless.... and your attempted denial makes you look like both a fool.... and stupid.
If you actually read the information on the W/C link you would have seen that W/C insurance is available but not required for self employed individuals
Yes, but if you had any real knowledge of the subject, you would know that you cannot get workmens comp to cover yourself!!! If you could, the world would have even more fraudulent workers comp claims out there. Every low-life scum would simply create a d/b/a.... get workers comp, then 'throw their back out'.
and on the off chance that OP's deceased husband was in independent contractor sub contracted by another firm
Who's ass did you pull that out of??
Where is there ANYTHING in this thread to even suggest that the OP's husband was working for anyone??
You would have been just as relevant if you had said that he might be covered by Martian insurance... since he might be from Mars.
it is possible that he might have been covered by the uninsured fund
Huh??? More 'made up' stuff??
What 'uninsured fund' are you talking about??
There are licensing requirements for pool and related construction
http://www.cslb.ca.gov/licensing/c53.asp but not for pool maintenance.
And how is that relevant??
It would appear that the deceased either suffered some collapse or sliped and fell resulting in death
Where did you get that information or is just some more of your made-up imaginary crap??
There is NOTHING in this thread to even hint at what might have happened to the OP's husband, or even what the cause of death was.
I would think that OP would have attempted to make a claim against the homeowner's insurance already
Under what LEGAL theory???
In any case, the bottom line is your link to workmens comp coverage as being possible is worthless..... unless he was an employee or contractor of someone else.
So, start posting accurate posts.... you have already been warned. The next one is the 'boot'.