Sorry to have not gotten back sooner, but I have been out all day and didn't see when this posted this morning.
I'm sorry things didn't go well, I thought you were going to contact the FLF office to have a different mediator assigned, that was the purpose of going to mediation again, to get an unbiased mediator.
I'm distressed that the mediator was already meeting with mom when dad arrived, that suggests collusion, BIAS, there should be an opportunity for both parties to present their issues on a level playing field. DD wasn't late was he, because they can start without him in that case.
Did DD present the facts that mom asked for these visitations and that they needed to be on Sat because of the children's schedules?
If the children's grades have suffered during this time and not while DD had visitation it may be because mom has interfered with their relationship with their father and not stress from the court proceedings.
Mom has been in contempt, over and over again and perjured herself to the court.
Did Mr. Therapist write his report? Was that and other evidence submitted?
How and when did the transcripts dissapear? They have to be somewhere because the court had them. You also need to print out the Fresno local rules SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF FRESNO. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005. CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION MEDIATION (FAMILY CODE ...
http://www.fresnosuperiorcourt.org/_pdfs/Fre ... 20Local%20Rules%20(7-1-05).pdf go to the Family law section, pay attention to section 34, also check mapquest door to door miles from DD home to Courthouse, if it is over 250 miles there are other options or judge descretion. Section 34-10 allows for exparte custody hearing if there is evidence of interference with visitation, section 34-11-2-d allows for challenge of mediator for reasons of bias. (CA FC 3163) Exparte communications etc might be evidence of bias.
Also check the section on the writing of orders, since the transcripts are missing and DD didn't write the order, if mom wrote the order, there is a problem, also there is a process to verify the agrements, the mediation reports, which didn't happen. It should not have taken the second hearing to get the therapist changed/clarified. Did the children come into mediation and ask for a female therapist or is it just mom? And if mom didn't contest in writing to the court in x days then her objections in mediation are moot, the mediator should know this and that mom is the one who requested the therapy in the first place. More reason to remove the mediator they are not following the current rules.
Also if #1 son has been in therapy without the court's knowledge and order, that is also forbidden. 34-4-H
PLEASE READ THESE RULES AND THE CA FAM LAW CODE SECTIONS 3100-3194 AND ANY OTHER REFERENCED CODE IN THE LOCAL RULES, TAKE THE RULES WITH YOU TO COURT NEXT WEEK AND MAKE AN EXPARTE APPLICATION TO CHANGE CUSTODY BASED ON MOM'S FAILURE TO PRESENT THE CHILDREN FOR COURT ORDERED VISITATION MADE WITHOUT ANY CONTEST. BE SURE TO GIVE THE APPROPRIATE 24 HOUR NOTICE AS PER THE RULES.BY 10 AM.
If all fails DD can request Family assessment/ EC 730 evaluation, and request mom pay since she is in contempt. Section 35 re the DA's involvement.